Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cruelty reviewed.

J R Hill

    Australian Veterinary Journal
    |August 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Unnecessary pain may be justified if the act causing it serves a lawful purpose, such as self-defense or protecting property. Cruelty is determined by considering factors like intent, negligence, and the justification of the pain inflicted.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Low sensitivity of a test for anti-Mullerian hormone to assess presence of ovaries in prepubertal bitches.

    Australian veterinary journal·2018
    Same author

    Sensitivity of spermatogonia to irradiation varies with age in pre-pubertal ram lambs.

    Animal reproduction science·2018
    Same author

    Robotic-Assisted Removal of Transvaginal Mesh, a Minimally-Invasive Approach.

    Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
    Same author

    Transplanted germ cells persist long-term in irradiated ram testes.

    Animal reproduction science·2013
    Same author

    Organization, barrier function and antimicrobial lipids of the oral mucosa.

    International journal of cosmetic science·2013
    Same author

    A shorter interval between irradiation of recipient testis and germ cell transplantation is detrimental to recovery of fertility in rams.

    International journal of andrology·2011
    Same journal

    Basal body temperature as a biomarker of reproductive state in ewes: A multi-method comparison.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    Same journal

    Impact of climate on Australian, non-Vector-borne infectious animal diseases: A scoping review.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    Same journal

    A 9-year retrospective mortality review of captive orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) in Australia.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    Same journal

    Antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Australian wildlife admitted to a veterinary hospital.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    Same journal

    Asymptomatic thrombocytopenia in Akitas: a prospective cross-sectional study of platelet characteristics in an Eastern Australian population.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    Same journal

    Partial amputation regrowth of P4 distal digit in an eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus): a case report.

    Australian veterinary journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Legal Studies
    • Animal Welfare Law

    Background:

    • Determining animal cruelty involves assessing the justification for inflicted pain.
    • Legal frameworks consider various factors when evaluating acts causing harm to animals.

    Observation:

    • The purpose of an act causing pain can justify what might otherwise be deemed unreasonable suffering.
    • Factors include the presence of sport, pain alleviation measures, and lawful excuses like self-defense or protection of others under imminent threat.

    Findings:

    • Lawful excuse requires reasonable measures proportionate to the threat, considering local customs, skill, and honest belief in potential benefits.
    • Cruelty is indicated by intentional or negligent acts or omissions causing unnecessary and unjustified pain, known to be so by the perpetrator.

    Implications:

    • This analysis provides a framework for legal decision-making in animal cruelty cases.
    • It highlights the importance of intent, justification, and proportionality in assessing harm to animals.