Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revisions with cemented long-stem prostheses.

R H Turner, A D Scheller, R H Emerson

    The Hip
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States: a mean ten-year survival analysis.

    The bone & joint journal·2016
    Same author

    A retrospective analysis of severe diaphyseal tibial fractures treated with external fixation.

    Orthopedics·2014
    Same author

    Selective hindfoot arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis.

    Orthopedics·2014
    Same author

    Total hip revision: indications and surgical technique.

    Orthopedics·2014
    Same author

    'Single-side' graft hip reconstruction in the deficient acetabulum: a case report demonstrating a surgical technique.

    Orthopedics·2014
    Same author

    Binding of comminuted meat: Effect of high pressure.

    Meat science·2011
    Same journal

    The Frank Stinchfield Award paper. Improvement of femoral head blood flow in steroid-treated rabbits using lipid-clearing agent.

    The Hip·1987
    Same journal

    The case for cemented hips.

    The Hip·1987
    Same journal

    Non cemented hip implants. Failures of biologically fixed devices: causes and treatment.

    The Hip·1987
    Same journal

    Theory and practice of cementless revision total hip arthroplasty.

    The Hip·1987
    Same journal

    Evaluation of bony ingrowth by technetium diphosphonate and sulfur colloid scanning in porous hip resurfacing.

    The Hip·1987
    Same journal

    Current status of noncemented hip implants.

    The Hip·1987
    See all related articles

    This study details surgical techniques for revising failed femoral prostheses using long-stem components. Recommendations include anchoring implants 100 mm into healthy bone for optimal fixation and femur protection.

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Biomaterials Engineering
    • Medical Device Technology

    Background:

    • Failed femoral prosthetic components necessitate revision surgery.
    • Optimizing fixation and protecting the femur are critical in revision arthroplasty.
    • Previous interventions can compromise bone stock, complicating revision procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe surgical techniques for removing and replacing failed femoral prosthetic components.
    • To establish a rationale for employing long-stem femoral components in revision surgery.
    • To enhance long-term implant stability and protect the femur from stress.

    Main Methods:

    • Detailed description of surgical procedures for femoral component revision.
    • Advocacy for distal intermedullary plugging for distal femur stability.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilization of precise biphased cementing techniques for proximal femur augmentation.

    • Main Results:

    • Recommended anchoring of revision femoral implants into at least 100 mm of healthy bone distal to prior issues.
    • Techniques aim to achieve microinterlock in the distal femur and bulk filling of the proximal femur.
    • Surgical methods require significant team preparation and practice.

    Conclusions:

    • The described surgical techniques provide a method for revising failed femoral components.
    • Long-stem femoral components, when implanted with specific techniques, can maximize fixation and protect the femur.
    • Careful surgical planning and execution are essential for successful revision arthroplasty outcomes.