Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum perineal stimulation. A controlled study.

A M Shepherd, E Tribe, D Bainton

    British Journal of Urology
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    How much do we know about schizophrenia and how well do we know it? Evidence from the Schizophrenia Library.

    Psychological medicine·2014
    Same author

    Childhood adversity in schizophrenia: a systematic meta-analysis.

    Psychological medicine·2012
    Same author

    Clinical pharmacology education: looking into the future.

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007
    Same author

    C-reactive protein, fibrin D-dimer, and risk of ischemic heart disease: the Caerphilly and Speedwell studies.

    Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2004
    Same author

    Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre.

    BJU international·2003
    Same author

    Primary care groups as community laboratories.

    Journal of public health medicine·2002
    Same journal

    Removal of ureteric calculus by the ureteric corkscrew in a case of calculous anuria.

    British journal of urology·2010
    Same journal

    Obstructive anuria, probably due to calculus.

    British journal of urology·2010
    Same journal

    The incidence of signs of renal injury following prolonged burial under debris in an unselected series of 764 airraid casualties admitted to hospital.

    British journal of urology·2010
    Same journal

    Contribution to the etiology of acquired fibrosis of the bladder neck.

    British journal of urology·2010
    Same journal

    True infective abacterial pyuria.

    British journal of urology·2010
    Same journal

    A malignant right kidney removed at operation, together with a short length of the vena cava.

    British journal of urology·2010
    See all related articles

    Maximal perineal stimulation (MPS) did not improve urinary incontinence in women. A single physiotherapy session with counseling was equally effective for stress, urge, and mixed incontinence.

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Gynecology
    • Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy

    Background:

    • Urinary incontinence (UI) significantly impacts women's quality of life.
    • Maximal perineal stimulation (MPS) has been proposed as a treatment for UI.
    • The efficacy of MPS in managing different types of UI remains debated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of maximal perineal stimulation (MPS) in treating female urinary incontinence.
    • To compare MPS efficacy against a control group receiving standard care.
    • To assess the impact of MPS on stress, urge, and mixed incontinence patterns.

    Main Methods:

    • A prospective study involving 107 incontinent women.
    • Randomized allocation into treatment (MPS under anesthesia) and control groups.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • All participants received clinical assessment, urodynamic study, and pelvic floor re-education; treatment group received additional MPS.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant difference in symptomatic improvement between the MPS group (60%) and the control group (66%).
    • Pelvic floor function, measured by perineometry, improved equally in both groups.
    • Improvements were observed irrespective of the incontinence pattern (stress, urge, mixed).

    Conclusions:

    • Maximal perineal stimulation (MPS) does not appear to contribute significantly to the management of urinary incontinence in women.
    • A single session of pelvic floor physiotherapy combined with counseling can yield beneficial results for various UI types.
    • Further research may be warranted to explore the optimal non-invasive conservative treatments for female urinary incontinence.