Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grading of bone tumors.

K K Unni1, D C Dahlin

  • 1Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 55901.

Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
|August 1, 1984
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tumor grading assesses cell resemblance to normal cells, with higher grades indicating less resemblance. This method is valuable for predicting prognosis in specific cancers like chondrosarcomas and angiosarcomas.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chondroblastoma.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Mayo clinic tumor rounds.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Mayo clinic tumor rounds.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Malignant lymphoma of bone.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Chordoma of the sacrum.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Malignant giant cell tumor of bone.

Orthopedics·2014

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Malignant tumor grading evaluates cellular differentiation.
  • Tumor cells' resemblance to normal counterparts determines grade.
  • Higher grades signify less differentiation and potentially more aggressive tumors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the principles of tumor grading.
  • To identify tumors suitable for grading.
  • To highlight the prognostic value of grading in specific sarcomas.

Main Methods:

  • Assessment of cytologic variation within tumors.
  • Comparison of tumor cell morphology to normal tissue.
  • Application of grading systems to various tumor types.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tumor grade correlates inversely with cellular resemblance to normal cells.
  • Most small cell tumors are not gradable due to uniform undifferentiation.
  • Bone sarcomas, particularly chondrosarcomas and angiosarcomas, can be graded.

Conclusions:

  • Tumor grading is a key prognostic tool.
  • Grading is most beneficial for tumors exhibiting cytologic variation.
  • Prognostic prediction in chondrosarcomas and angiosarcomas is significantly enhanced by grading.