Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lung dose calculations using computerized tomography: is there a need for pixel based procedures?

J Van Dyk

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Developing Innovative, Robust and Affordable Medical Linear Accelerators for Challenging Environments.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2019
    Same author

    Sci-Fri PM: Delivery - 11: Accuracy considerations in modern radiation oncology: An update.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    MO-D-BRB-01: Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainties in Radiation Therapy: A Preview of an Upcoming IAEA Report.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    Sci-Thurs PM: Delivery-07: Evaluation of prospects to use daily megavoltage CT studies for adaptive radiotherapy.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    Poster - Thurs Eve-23: Effect of lung density and geometry variation on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: A Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    Poster - Thurs Eve-41: Imaging and radiation delivery in helical tomotherapy: Phantom study of a moving target.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same journal

    Single Percussive Ventilation Breath-hold Imaging and Delivery in Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Initial Observations From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    Same journal

    Proton beam therapy in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome, prognostic factors and the effect of timing of radiation therapy.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    Same journal

    Hypofractionated Proton Reirradiation for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Clinical and Dosimetric Outcomes from a Large Single Institution Series.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    Same journal

    Gastrointestinal Motility-Induced Interplay in Pancreas Proton Therapy: Motion Simulation and Dosimetric Impact.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    Same journal

    Intra-fractional Voxel-wise Anatomical Motion Tracking Guided by Multimodal Respiratory Surrogates in Radiotherapy: Framework Development and Multi-Center Validation.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    Same journal

    A Gaussian-based planning approach for robust dose-escalated stereotactic body proton therapy.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
    See all related articles

    Accurate lung radiotherapy requires detailed patient-specific lung density data from computed tomography (CT) scans. Using average lung density assumptions can lead to significant errors in radiation dose calculations.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Physics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiotherapy Planning

    Background:

    • Thoracic radiotherapy necessitates radiation beams passing through lung tissues, which are radiosensitive and of low density.
    • Accurate dose calculation in the lungs is crucial for effective radiotherapy and minimizing side effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the potential errors in lung dose calculations arising from different lung density assumptions.
    • To determine the necessary level of detail in lung density data for accurate radiotherapy planning.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of lung dose calculations using patient-specific computed tomography (CT) data versus assumed average lung densities.
    • Analysis of the impact of varying lung density assumptions on dose accuracy.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Different levels of accuracy in lung dose calculations are achievable depending on the sophistication of lung density assumptions.
    • The use of average bulk lung density can introduce significant errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Detailed anatomical density data from CT scans are essential for achieving a 5% accuracy in radiation absorbed dose delivery to the lungs for all patients.
    • Simplified lung density assumptions are insufficient for precise radiotherapy planning in the thorax.