Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In vitro testing for cancer-causing chemicals.

J McCann

    Hospital Practice (Office Ed.)
    |September 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Identifying carcinogenic chemicals is crucial. Short-term mutagenesis tests offer a faster, cheaper alternative to animal bioassays for screening environmental chemicals, but their limitations must be considered.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Discharge-delaying factors for patients suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in an Irish tertiary hospital during COVID-19.

    JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2021
    Same author

    Brief reports.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Brief reports.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial.

    Journal of wound care·2015
    Same author

    MRI assessment of changes in liver iron deposition post-venesection.

    European journal of radiology·2010
    Same author

    Tag rugby: a safe alternative? A review of hand injuries sustained playing tag rugby (2007 season).

    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental toxicology
    • Chemical carcinogenesis
    • Genotoxicity testing

    Background:

    • Distinguishing carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic environmental chemicals is a significant public health challenge.
    • Traditional whole-animal bioassays are resource-intensive, limiting their utility for routine screening.
    • There is a need for efficient methods to assess chemical carcinogenicity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the utility of short-term in vitro and in vivo tests for screening environmental chemicals for carcinogenic potential.
    • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these alternative testing strategies.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of scientific literature on short-term genotoxicity and mutagenesis assays.
    • Analysis of the principles behind in vitro and in vivo screening tests.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of DNA interaction as a marker for potential carcinogenicity.

    • Main Results:

    • Short-term tests, focusing on mutagenesis and DNA interaction, are being explored as alternatives to animal bioassays.
    • These assays can provide rapid indications of a chemical's potential to cause cancer.
    • The predictive value and limitations of these tests require careful consideration.

    Conclusions:

    • Short-term mutagenesis and DNA interaction assays show promise for screening environmental chemicals.
    • While cost-effective and time-efficient, these methods have limitations that necessitate further research and validation.
    • A balanced approach integrating various testing strategies is essential for accurate carcinogenicity assessment.