Primate raphe- and reticulospinal neurons: effects of stimulation in periaqueductal gray or VPLc thalamic nucleus

Recordings were made from 132 raphe- and reticulospinal tract neurons in the medial part of the lower brain stem in 32 anesthetized monkeys. Recording sites were in the nucleus raphe magnus, the rostral nucleus raphe obscurus, and the reticular formation adjacent to the raphe. The neurons were identified by antidromic activation from the upper lumbar spinal cord. Of the population sampled, 83 cells were activated antidromically from the left dorsal lateral funiculus (DLF), 32 from the right DLF, and 17 from both sides. The mean latency for antidromic activation was 8.2 +/- 7.1 ms, corresponding to a mean conduction velocity of 22.8 m/s. No conduction velocities characteristic of unmyelinated axons were observed. Collision tests indicated that raphe-spinal axons that bifurcated to descend in both DLFs branched within the spinal cord. The effects of stimulation in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) or adjacent midbrain reticular formation were tested on 102 spinally projecting neurons in the medial medulla. Of these, 60 cells were excited, 9 cells were inhibited, 8 showed mixed excitation and inhibition, and 25 cells were unaffected. The mean latency for excitation was 11.6 ms and for inhibition, 17.8 ms. Threshold for excitation of raphe- and reticulospinal neurons ranged from 50 to 400 microA. Raphe- and reticulospinal tract cells could often (31/46 cells tested) be excited following stimulation in the ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus. The mean latency of excitation was 35.6 ms (range, 6-112 ms). Receptive fields could be demonstrated for 80 raphe- and reticulospinal cells, while 48 neurons possessed no demonstrable cutaneous receptive field. Most cells had large excitatory receptive fields, often encompassing the surface of the entire body and face. Some neurons had complex excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields, whereas other cells had large inhibitory receptive fields over much of the surface of the body and face. For most cells (52/55) with excitatory receptive fields, the only effective stimuli were noxious mechanical or noxious heat stimuli. Nonnoxious mechanical stimuli, such as brushing the skin, were capable of activating only a few (3/55) raphe- and reticulospinal neurons, and these were more effectively excited by noxious stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)