Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neuropathologic changes following direct-current stimulation of the rat sciatic nerve.

S G Chase, G B Hughes, A W Dudley

    Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery : Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Direct-current nerve stimulators are safe for surgical dissections when used appropriately. This study simulated clinical use, finding no significant difference compared to control groups, supporting their judicious application in surgery.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Are we ordering too many PSA tests? Prostate cancer diagnosis and PSA screening patterns for a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

    Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2001
    Same author

    Lactase synthesis is pretranslationally regulated in protein-deficient pigs fed a protein-sufficient diet.

    American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2001
    Same author

    The decline of ear surgery in the 21st century.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same author

    Parenteral nutrition selectively decreases protein synthesis in the small intestine.

    The American journal of physiology·1998
    Same author

    Autoimmune inner ear disease--a real entity?

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·1997
    Same author

    Can sensitized lymphocytes retain reactivity to inner ear antigens after retrieval from frozen storage?

    The Laryngoscope·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Neurosurgery
    • Surgical Technology

    Background:

    • Peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS) are valuable tools in surgical dissections.
    • Concerns exist regarding the safety of direct-current (DC) nerve stimulators compared to pulsed-current (PC) stimulators.
    • Previous safety studies did not accurately reflect routine clinical settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety of direct-current peripheral nerve stimulators in a simulated surgical dissection setting.
    • To address limitations of prior research by approximating clinical usage conditions.
    • To provide evidence-based guidance on the appropriate use of DC nerve stimulators.

    Main Methods:

    • An experimental design was employed to simulate the use of a DC peripheral nerve stimulator during surgical dissection.
    • An animal model was utilized to approximate clinical conditions as closely as possible.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental and control groups were compared to assess safety outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • The study found no statistically significant difference in safety outcomes between the experimental group using DC nerve stimulation and the control group.
    • Results indicate that DC nerve stimulation did not cause adverse effects under the simulated surgical conditions.
    • The findings challenge previous safety concerns by demonstrating safety in a more clinically relevant context.

    Conclusions:

    • Direct-current nerve stimulation is considered safe when utilized judiciously and appropriately in surgical dissections.
    • The study supports the continued use of DC nerve stimulators in clinical practice under proper guidelines.
    • Further research may explore long-term effects and optimal usage parameters for DC nerve stimulation.