Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

W A Murphy, K DeSchryver-Kecskemeti

    Radiology
    |May 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Perfusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement (PWI/DCE) morphologic, qualitative, semiquantitative, and radiomics features predicting undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) treatment response.

    Scientific reports·2024
    Same author

    Consistency of response and image recognition, pulmonary nodules.

    The British journal of radiology·2014
    Same author

    Analysis of responses to hAmylin, hCGRP, and hADM in isolated resistance arteries from the mesenteric vascular bed of the rat.

    Peptides·2001
    Same author

    GI side-effects of a possible therapeutic GRF analogue in monkeys are likely due to VIP receptor agonist activity.

    Peptides·2001
    Same author

    Differential inhibition of growth hormone secretion by analogs selective for somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 in human growth-hormone-secreting adenoma cells in vitro.

    Neuroendocrinology·2001
    Same author

    Antitumor and antiangiogenic effects of somatostatin receptor-targeted in situ radiation with (111)In-DTPA-JIC 2DL.

    The Journal of surgical research·2001
    Same journal

    Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Mammographic clustered microcalcifications are sensitive but nonspecific cancer indicators. Breast biopsy is recommended for diagnosis due to overlapping benign and malignant features on imaging.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Oncology
    • Pathology

    Background:

    • Mammography is a key tool for breast cancer screening.
    • Isolated, clustered microcalcifications are a common mammographic finding requiring further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mammography for isolated, clustered microcalcifications.
    • To determine the malignancy rate and characteristics of these lesions.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 31 mammography cases with isolated, clustered microcalcifications.
    • Correlation of radiologic findings with histopathologic diagnoses.

    Main Results:

    • Isolated, clustered microcalcifications showed high sensitivity but low specificity for malignancy.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • 35% of biopsied lesions were malignant, with half being noninvasive.
  • Radiologic and histopathologic features showed significant overlap between benign and malignant cases.

    • Conclusions:

    • Mammography is sensitive for detecting suspicious microcalcifications but cannot definitively differentiate benign from malignant lesions.
    • Breast biopsy remains essential for accurate diagnosis of isolated, clustered microcalcifications.