Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selection from visual persistence by perceptual groups and category membership.

P M Merikle

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |September 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    Investigating visual persistence, this study found that both physical and category cues can elicit partial-report (PR) superiority under specific conditions. These findings challenge the idea of a literal, precategorical storage system in visual memory.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Synaesthesia: a case study of discordant monozygotic twins.

    Neurocase·2002
    Same author

    Synaesthetic photisms influence visual perception.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2001
    Same author

    Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

    Perception & psychophysics·2001
    Same author

    Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology.

    Cognition·2001
    Same author

    Conscious and unconscious influences of memory: temporal dynamics.

    Memory (Hove, England)·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Visual Perception
    • Human Memory

    Background:

    • Visual persistence research, following Sperling, uses partial-report (PR) and whole-report (WR) to estimate information availability.
    • Previous findings suggested PR superiority only with physical cues, supporting a literal, precategorical storage (e.g., iconic memory).
    • This interpretation implies stored information is inherently "literal" and precategorical.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore alternative explanations for why only physical PR cues typically produced PR superiority.
    • To investigate the conditions under which category-based PR cues can also yield PR superiority.
    • To challenge interpretations of visual persistence based on a literal, precategorical storage system.

    Main Methods:

    • Experiments 1 & 2: Manipulated perceptual grouping (proximity, similarity) in multi-letter displays to assess physical PR cue effectiveness.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 3 & 4: Used category PR cues (letter-digit) with equated cue onset latency and uncertainty across PR and WR conditions.
  • Experiments 5 & 6: Varied cue delay to examine its effect on PR superiorities for both physical and category cues.

    • Main Results:

    • Physical PR cue effectiveness depended on the 'goodness' of perceptual groups; cues compatible with groups yielded greater PR superiority.
    • Category PR cues produced significant PR superiority when cue onset latency and uncertainty were controlled.
    • PR superiority for both physical and category cues decreased with increased cue delay, at comparable rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The effectiveness of physical cues is influenced by perceptual grouping, questioning the 'literal' nature of visual persistence.
    • Category PR cues can elicit PR superiority under appropriate conditions, further challenging precategorical storage models.
    • A multichannel view of the visual system offers a more adequate conceptualization of visual persistence than storage system metaphors.