Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A note on "Optical motions as information for unsigned depth".

K Prazdny

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |April 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Illusory deformations of chromatic gratings under motion.

    Spatial vision·1987
    Same author

    Vertical disparity nulling in random-dot stereograms.

    Biological cybernetics·1987
    Same author

    'Capture' of stereopsis by illusory contours.

    Nature·1986
    Same author

    Illusory contours from inducers defined solely by spatiotemporal correlation.

    Perception & psychophysics·1986
    Same author

    Psychophysical and computational studies of random-dot Moire patterns.

    Spatial vision·1986
    Same author

    Three-dimensional structure from long-range apparent motion.

    Perception·1986

    This study revises the analysis of optical flow, questioning its accuracy for perceiving relative distance. It identifies analytical fallacies in prior research, not the experimental data itself.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Ecological psychology
    • Cognitive science

    Background:

    • Farber and McConkie questioned the use of optical flow for accurate perception of relative distance.
    • This research addresses the validity of the analytical framework used in their critique.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and critique analytical fallacies in Farber and McConkie's work on optical flow.
    • To discuss issues related to the inaccurate analysis of optical flow for depth perception.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical analysis and critique of existing arguments.
    • Focus on the logical and analytical underpinnings of research on optical flow and depth perception.

    Main Results:

    • Identified specific analytical fallacies in Farber and McConkie's arguments.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated that the critique is based on flawed analytical reasoning, not experimental results.

    • Conclusions:

    • The analysis presented by Farber and McConkie contains significant fallacies.
    • Further examination of the analytical basis is required before drawing conclusions about optical flow and depth perception.