Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do attention and decision follow perception Comment on Miller.

D Navon

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |December 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study examines global precedence in perception, arguing perceptual precedence is a key factor in asymmetric interference. Findings suggest global precedence is compatible with information interaction, challenging attention-based explanations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Relative judgment seems to be the key: revisiting the Beck effect.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2000
    Same author

    A case of a dual frame of reference.

    Perception·1992
    Same author

    Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·1991
    Same author

    Why do we blame the mirror for reversing left and right?

    Cognition·1987
    Same author

    Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1987
    Same author

    Is attention allocation sensitive to word informativeness?

    Psychological research·1987

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Perceptual Science

    Background:

    • The concept of global precedence in visual perception suggests that global features are processed before local features.
    • Miller's discussion raises questions about the interpretation of asymmetric interference data in this context.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate the role of perceptual precedence in asymmetric interference.
    • To assess the compatibility of global precedence with the interaction of local and global information.
    • To question the exclusive reliance on attention or decision processes in explaining perceptual outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical analysis of perceptual precedence and global precedence.
    • Examination of asymmetric interference findings in visual perception research.
    • Critique of attention- and decision-based explanations for perceptual effects.

    Main Results:

    • Perceptual precedence offers a reasonable explanation for asymmetric interference in certain contexts.
    • Global precedence does not preclude interaction between local and global information processing.
    • The role of attention and decision in perception may be more integral than previously assumed.

    Conclusions:

    • Global precedence remains a viable concept, even with evidence of information interaction.
    • Asymmetric interference data alone may not definitively resolve the global precedence debate.
    • Perceptual and attentional mechanisms are intricately linked in shaping our perception.

    Related Experiment Videos