Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid?

Journal of equine veterinary science·2026

Same author

Use of a spot-check protocol to measure ventricular response rate in dogs with atrial fibrillation.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025

Same author

Use of the subcostal view for obtaining aortic spectral Doppler-derived outflow velocities in cats.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025

Same author

Tight nosebands apply high pressures on the horses' face and alter stride kinematics.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025

Same author

'HepConomics': cost-effective, indeed, but how can we pay for it?

Journal of viral hepatitis·2015

Same author

Sustained perceptual invisibility of solid shapes following contour adaptation to partial outlines.

Consciousness and cognition·2014

Same journal

Understanding vulnerability through variability: a longitudinal twin study linking sex differences in neurodiversity, neurodevelopment and X-linked genetic mechanisms.

Behavioural brain research·2026

Same journal

Hippocampal plasticity predicts behavioral lateralization and stress resilience in laying hen chicks.

Behavioural brain research·2026

Same journal

Effects of Retatrutide on Learning and Memory in Streptozotocin-Induced Male Diabetic Rats.

Behavioural brain research·2026

Same journal

Bacopa-Enriched Formulation Enhances Memory and Synaptic Plasticity in a Rat Model of Vascular Dementia.

Behavioural brain research·2026

Same journal

Prior exposure to methylphenidate attenuates ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in zebrafish.

Behavioural brain research·2026

Same journal

Plasma nectin-4 levels are associated with changes in executive function in patients with methamphetamine use disorder undergoing treatment.

Behavioural brain research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice

Published on: August 30, 2017

Contrast discrimination in the cat.

R Blake, I Petrakis

Behavioural Brain Research

|May 1, 1984

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cats can discriminate between visual contrast differences. Their contrast discrimination function is linear on log/log plots, with slope varying by spatial frequency, offering insights into neural processing.

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice

Published on: August 30, 2017

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Vision science
Neuroscience
Animal behavior

Background:

Understanding visual perception requires quantifying how animals detect subtle differences in stimuli.
Contrast sensitivity is a fundamental aspect of visual processing, crucial for object recognition and navigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine the contrast increment thresholds in cats across various baseline contrast levels.
To characterize the contrast discrimination function in cats and its relationship with spatial frequency.
To compare behavioral contrast discrimination data with neural properties of retinal and cortical neurons.

Main Methods:

Cats were trained using operant conditioning to distinguish between sinusoidal grating patterns that varied only in contrast.
Contrast increment thresholds were measured at different baseline contrast levels.
Data were plotted on log/log coordinates to generate a contrast discrimination function.

Main Results:

The contrast discrimination function in cats was found to be linear when plotted on log/log coordinates.
The slope of this linear function demonstrated a dependency on spatial frequency.
These behavioral findings provide a quantitative measure of contrast perception in cats.

Conclusions:

Cats exhibit a linear contrast discrimination function on log/log scales, indicating a consistent pattern in their ability to perceive contrast changes.
The spatial frequency-dependent slope suggests that the neural mechanisms underlying contrast discrimination vary with visual detail.
The study provides a behavioral correlate for understanding the contrast response properties of feline visual pathways.