Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.

R E FitzZaland, G D Zink

    Ear and Hearing
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hearing aids. A study of the performance capabilities of new instruments.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1979
    Same author

    The acoustic reflex and loudness recruitment.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·1977
    Same author

    Programming for detection and management of communication disorders in British Columbia.

    Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·1975
    Same author

    Hearing aids: one aspect of a state public school hearing conservation program.

    The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1968
    Same journal

    Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    Same journal

    Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

    Ear and hearing·2026
    See all related articles

    This study evaluated hearing screening for 3,510 children using pure-tone and immittance tests. It recommends cost-effective strategies and optimal false positive ranges for effective auditory screening programs.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Pediatric Health
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Early identification of hearing loss in children is crucial for development.
    • Standardized screening protocols are needed for efficiency and accuracy.
    • Understanding screening limitations, like false positives, is essential.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficiency of different hearing screening techniques.
    • To recommend requirements for cost-effective and effective pediatric hearing screening.
    • To identify an optimal range of false positives and appropriate validators for auditory screening.

    Main Methods:

    • Screened 3,510 children using three pure-tone and two immittance techniques.
    • Controlled variables including procedures, equipment, personnel, and environment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted follow-up audiological and medical examinations within 2 days for all children.

    • Main Results:

    • Compared the efficiency of various hearing screening procedures.
    • Provided recommendations for cost-efficient and effective hearing screening.
    • Indicated an optimal range for false positives in screening programs.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized and controlled screening methods enhance efficiency.
    • Cost-effectiveness in pediatric hearing screening requires careful consideration of procedures and validation.
    • Establishing optimal false positive rates and reliable validators is key to successful auditory screening programs.