Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic reflex thresholds: variability and distribution effects.

S A Gelfand, N Piper

    Ear and Hearing
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Unilateral dilated pupil following nasotracheal intubation.

    Anaesthesia reports·2021
    Same author

    Automating patient safety incident reporting to improve healthcare quality in the defence medical services.

    Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2015
    Same author

    [Staged treatment of patient with combined trauma with diffuse peritonitis and numerous complications].

    Vestnik khirurgii imeni I. I. Grekova·2012
    Same author

    War and memory: victim identity and the struggle for compensation in Japan.

    War & society·2007
    Same author

    Immediate life support training in an operational environment.

    Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service·2004
    Same author

    Optimizing the reliability of speech recognition scores.

    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1998

    Audiometric data explains only a small portion of acoustic reflex threshold (ART) variance. New decile data provides a better understanding of ART distributions across hearing levels for normal and impaired ears.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Hearing Science
    • Speech and Hearing Sciences

    Background:

    • Acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) are crucial audiological measures.
    • Understanding the relationship between hearing loss and ARTs is essential for accurate diagnosis.
    • Previous studies have explored this relationship, but significant unexplained variance remains.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the effects of hearing loss on ARTs at specific frequencies (500, 1000, 2000 Hz).
    • To analyze the variance in ART levels that cannot be explained by audiometric data alone.
    • To establish normative ART data based on hearing level distributions.

    Main Methods:

    • Multiple linear regression analyses were performed on ART data from 1833 ears.
    • Stepwise inclusion models were used to assess the impact of hearing loss (500-4000 Hz) on ARTs.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Deciles were calculated for ARTs across the 10th to 90th percentile range.

    • Main Results:

    • Statistically significant regression equations were developed, but explained only 1-47% of ART variance.
    • A wide variance in ARTs was observed, indicating limitations of audiometric data in predicting ART levels.
    • Decile data provided a more comprehensive view of ART distributions as a function of hearing level.

    Conclusions:

    • Audiometric data alone is insufficient to fully explain the variability in acoustic reflex thresholds.
    • The calculated deciles of ARTs offer valuable insights into their distribution in individuals with normal hearing and cochlear impairment.
    • This study expands upon existing knowledge of ART distributions and their clinical relevance.