Related Experiment Videos
A randomized double-blind study of acetohydroxamic acid in struvite nephrolithiasis
The New England Journal of Medicine
|September 20, 1984
Summary
Acetohydroxamic acid effectively inhibited struvite stone growth in patients with urea-splitting bacteria. However, high rates of adverse effects suggest caution for long-term use in struvite nephrolithiasis.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Urology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Struvite stones are associated with urinary tract infections caused by urea-splitting bacteria.
- Bacterial urease activity contributes to struvite stone formation and growth.
- Acetohydroxamic acid is a bacterial urease inhibitor with potential therapeutic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of acetohydroxamic acid in inhibiting the growth of struvite stones.
- To assess the safety and adverse effects associated with acetohydroxamic acid treatment.
- To compare acetohydroxamic acid therapy with placebo in a randomized double-blind study.
Main Methods:
- A randomized double-blind study comparing acetohydroxamic acid (15 mg/kg/day) with placebo.
- Participants included patients with struvite stones and urea-splitting bacterial infections.
- Study duration averaged 15.8 months for acetohydroxamic acid and 19.6 months for placebo.
Main Results:
- No patient receiving acetohydroxamic acid experienced a doubling of stone size, unlike 7 placebo recipients (P < 0.01).
- Adverse effects led to dose reduction or cessation in 9 acetohydroxamic acid patients versus 1 placebo patient (P < 0.01).
- Tremulousness and phlebothrombosis were observed in the acetohydroxamic acid group.
Conclusions:
- Acetohydroxamic acid demonstrates short-term efficacy in inhibiting struvite stone growth in infected patients.
- High prevalence of adverse reactions necessitates careful consideration for long-term therapy.
- Long-term toxicity and effectiveness for struvite nephrolithiasis require further definition.