Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dyslexia: saccadic eye movements.

J L Black, D W Collins, J N De Roach

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |June 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Western Australian adolescent emotional wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

    Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health·2022
    Same author

    Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review.

    Anaesthesia·2020
    Same author

    Susceptibility of Rice to Oebalus pugnax (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Feeding at Different Levels of Grain Maturity and Impacts on Insecticide Termination.

    Journal of economic entomology·2019
    Same author

    Review: Effects of fibre, grain starch digestion rate and the ileal brake on voluntary feed intake in pigs.

    Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2019
    Same author

    Examining risk factors for cardiovascular disease among food bank members in Vancouver.

    Preventive medicine reports·2018
    Same author

    A Mini-Review: Leber Congenital Amaurosis: Identification of Disease-Causing Variants and Personalised Therapies.

    Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2018
    Same journal

    Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    Same journal

    Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

    Perceptual and motor skills·2026
    See all related articles

    Poor readers exhibit normal saccadic eye movement (SEM) parameters, suggesting reading difficulties stem from higher cognitive processes, not basic visual-motor control. Maturational changes in SEM were also analyzed in both groups.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Ophthalmology

    Background:

    • Saccadic eye movements (SEM) are crucial for visual processing during reading.
    • Previous research suggests potential SEM abnormalities in individuals with reading impairments.
    • Understanding SEM parameters in poor readers is vital for identifying underlying causes of dyslexia.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare saccadic eye movement parameters between poor-reading children and normally reading children.
    • To investigate maturational changes in SEM across a range of ages in both groups.
    • To determine if differences in basic SEM performance correlate with reading ability.

    Main Methods:

    • Studied saccadic latency, accuracy, velocity, and acceleration in refixation eye movements.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed differences in latency for abduct and adduct movements.
  • Examined saccade shapes and maturational trends in 62 children (28 poor readers, 31 normal readers) aged 6.0–16.9 years.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were found in basic saccadic eye movement performance between poor and normal readers.
    • Eye movement characteristics during complex reading tasks, however, differed significantly.
    • Maturational changes in SEM parameters were observed in both groups, but did not differentiate reading ability.

    Conclusions:

    • Basic saccadic eye movement control is not a primary deficit in children with poor reading ability.
    • Reading difficulties in these children likely arise from higher-level cognitive or processing challenges.
    • Further research should explore the relationship between complex visual processing and reading impairments.