Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[Refusal of catamnestic testing].

D Waridel, C Müller, J Schöpf

    Annales Medico-Psychologiques
    |March 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Patients refusing psychiatric catamnesis studies (10%) showed no significant differences from participants. Including them would not alter overall statistical research findings, ensuring study validity.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Psychiatrists who took shelter in French-speaking Switzerland from 1933-1945].

    Revue medicale de la Suisse romande·1992
    Same author

    Systemic levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha during hemodialysis with cellulosic membranes: no effect of the sterilization procedure.

    Artificial organs·1992
    Same author

    Quantitative assessment of urinary protein and enzyme excretion--a diagnostic programme for the detection of renal involvement in type I diabetes mellitus.

    Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·1992
    Same author

    [Immunohistochemical findings in otosclerotic lesions].

    HNO·1992
    Same author

    Peri-operative liver graft function: monitoring using the relationship between blood glucose and oxygen consumption during anaesthesia.

    Anaesthesia·1992
    Same author

    Variables associated with the assessment of systemic tumor necrosis factor alpha levels during hemodialysis.

    The International journal of artificial organs·1992
    Same journal

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2023
    Same journal

    [The effects of the pandemic on students in a psychodynamic setting].

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2023
    Same journal

    [The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on BAPU students: What analyzes were made by clinicians? The specifics of student care needs in a crisis context].

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2023
    Same journal

    Examining the relationship between the thinking styles and the motivation aspects of the individuals working in the health sector in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of hospital staff.

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2022
    Same journal

    [Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents and treatments].

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2022
    Same journal

    [Assessing psychological, anxiety, depression and stress levels of Senegalese general population during COVID-19 pandemic].

    Annales medico-psychologiques·2022
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Epidemiology

    Context:

    • Analysis of patient refusal in psychiatric catamnesis studies.
    • Examines a cohort of 866 individuals admitted for psychiatric care.
    • Focuses on the 10% of patients who declined participation in the Enquête de Lausanne study.

    Purpose:

    • To identify characteristics of patients refusing catamnesis testing.
    • To assess the impact of patient refusal on study outcomes.
    • To validate the representativeness of the study sample.

    Summary:

    • Compared patients who underwent catamnesis with those who refused.
    • Found no statistically significant differences between the two groups.
    • Concluded that non-participants did not compromise the study's overall statistical results.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Impact:

    • Recommends discretion and respect for individual autonomy in psychiatric research.
    • Suggests involving the treating physician in future catamnesis studies for improved participation and data quality.
    • Highlights the generalizability of findings despite partial non-response.