Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Office audiometry.

The Journal of Family Practice

|October 1, 1984

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right hearing test depends on practitioner goals and examiner skills. Office audiometry offers superior diagnostic and management information compared to tuning-fork tests.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Changes in Myocardial Metabolism Preceding Sudden Cardiac Death.

Frontiers in physiology·2020

Same author

Experimental capabilities of 0.4 PW, 1 shot/min Scarlet laser facility for high energy density science.

Applied optics·2016

Same author

Towards manipulating relativistic laser pulses with micro-tube plasma lenses.

Scientific reports·2016

Same author

Microengineering Laser Plasma Interactions at Relativistic Intensities.

Physical review letters·2016

Same author

Comparison of two tourniquet application times for regional intravenous limb perfusions with amikacin in sedated or anesthetized horses.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2015

Same author

Perspectives on strategies and challenges in the conversation about stem cells for spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord·2015

Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Audiology
Otolaryngology
Diagnostic audiology

Background:

Accurate hearing assessment is crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment.
Traditional methods like tuning-fork tests have limitations in providing comprehensive auditory information.
The choice of audiological tests impacts diagnostic efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of different hearing test procedures.
To compare office audiometry with tuning-fork tests for diagnostic and management purposes.
To highlight the importance of selecting appropriate audiological assessments.

Main Methods:

Review of audiological testing methodologies.
Comparative analysis of tuning-fork tests and office audiometry.

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of diagnostic information yielded by each test type.

Main Results:

Office audiometry provides more detailed and unique diagnostic information than tuning-fork tests.
The selection of hearing test procedures should align with clinical objectives and examiner proficiency.
Audiometry in an office setting is advantageous for hearing assessment.

Conclusions:

Office audiometry is the preferred method for comprehensive hearing evaluation.
Practitioner goals and examiner skills are key factors in selecting audiological tests.
Effective hearing assessment relies on appropriate test selection and execution.