Related Experiment Videos
Survival following resection for second and third primary lung cancers
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|October 1, 1984
Summary
Aggressive surgery for multiple primary lung cancers is supported by outcomes. Sequential resections for new lung cancer lesions show survival benefits, even after 10 years.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Pulmonology
Background:
- The management of multiple primary lung cancers, including sequential resections, presents ongoing clinical debate.
- Defining new primary lung cancer lesions requires specific criteria, such as distinct histology, prolonged intervals, and anatomical separation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes and survival rates of patients undergoing multiple resections for primary lung cancers.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of aggressive surgical management for synchronous and metachronous lung tumors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 90 patients who underwent multiple resections for bronchogenic carcinoma between 1960 and 1983.
- Analysis of surgical procedures (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segmentectomy, etc.) at initial, second, and third resections.
- Evaluation of histologic type changes, time intervals between procedures, and perioperative mortality.
Main Results:
- Eighty patients had metachronous lesions, with a maximum interval of over 17 years between resections.
- A different cell type was identified in 20 patients at second resection and three at third resection.
- Perioperative mortality for the second operation was 8% (7/90), with no deaths for third resections.
- Cumulative survival after second resection for metachronous tumors was 33% at 5 years and 20% at 10 years.
Conclusions:
- The findings support an aggressive surgical strategy for managing second and third primary lung cancers.
- Sequential resections can achieve significant long-term survival in selected patients with multiple primary lung cancers.