Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Magnetic resonance imaging systems: optimization in clinical use.

J B Kneeland, R J Knowles, P T Cahill

    Radiology
    |November 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Optimizing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging involves adjusting parameters like gradient strengths and signal averaging. This study determined optimal settings for a 0.5T system, balancing image quality and study time for head and body coils.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2006
    Same author

    Proteoglycan-induced changes in T1rho-relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T.

    Magnetic resonance in medicine·2001
    Same author

    Human knee: in vivo T1(rho)-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T--preliminary experience.

    Radiology·2001
    Same author

    Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
    Same author

    The effect of observer experience on magnetic resonance imaging interpretation and localization of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions.

    The Journal of hand surgery·2001
    Same author

    MRI of the knee: value of short echo time fast spin-echo using high performance gradients versus conventional spin-echo imaging for the detection of meniscal tears.

    Skeletal radiology·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Biophysics
    • Radiology

    Background:

    • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers numerous parameters that significantly influence image quality.
    • User-controlled parameters include receiver frequency, tip angles, gradient strengths, signal averaging, phase encoding steps, and repetition times.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To systematically vary MR imaging parameters and determine optimal values for a 0.5T Teslacon system.
    • To evaluate the trade-off between image quality and scan duration.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic variation of key MR imaging parameters (receiver frequency, tip angles, gradient strengths, signal averaging, phase encoding steps, repetition times).
    • Utilized both phantom studies and normal volunteers to assess parameter effects.
    • Focused on identifying critical adjustments, particularly the z-compensatory gradient.

    Main Results:

    • Optimal parameter values were determined for the 0.5T Teslacon system.
    • The z-compensatory gradient was identified as the most critical adjustment under normal tuning conditions.
    • Recommended settings for balancing image quality and study time: 192 gradient steps with two signal averages for the head coil, and 192 gradient steps with four signal averages for the body coil.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic optimization of MR imaging parameters is essential for achieving high image quality.
    • The z-compensatory gradient requires careful tuning for optimal performance.
    • Specific parameter settings (gradient steps and signal averages) are recommended for head and body imaging to balance quality and efficiency.

    Related Experiment Videos