Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A developmental study of learning disabilities and memory.

S J Ceci

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
    |October 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Editors' Foreword.

    Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2015
    Same author

    Developmental reversals in false memory: a review of data and theory.

    Psychological bulletin·2008
    Same author

    Psychological Science in the Public Interest: the case for juried analyses.

    Psychological science·2001
    Same author

    Draw It again Sam: the effect of drawing on children's suggestibility and source monitoring ability.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2000
    Same author

    Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2000
    Same author

    The effects of repeated experience on children's suggestibility.

    Developmental psychology·1999
    Same journal

    The interplay between Theory of Mind inferencing and visual attention in narrative comprehension in autistic preschoolers.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Executive function and preschoolers' responses to severe transgressions: implications for early forgiveness.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Shared cognitive risk factors underlying rapid automatized naming deficits for the comorbidity of developmental dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A computational parameter estimation via Bundesen's theory of visual attention.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Do young children understand the objectivity of reality?

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Learning words by ear or by eye: effects of modality on lexical configuration and lexicalization.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Thinking outside the Box: Causal uncertainty motivates children's over-imitation.

    Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
    See all related articles

    Children

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Learning disabilities (LD) impact semantic processing.
    • Understanding memory recall in children is crucial for educational interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate semantic processing differences between learning-disabled (LD) and non-learning-disabled (NORM) children.
    • To examine age-related recall patterns in children with and without learning disabilities.

    Main Methods:

    • Presented 7-, 10-, and 13-year-old LD and NORM children with word lists.
    • Word lists contained semantically related words, presented contiguously or spaced.
    • Assessed free recall performance for all children.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • All children recalled adjacent words (positions 9-10) more effectively than spaced words.
    • Younger children and LD children showed lower recall for spaced words compared to older and NORM children.
    • Automatic semantic processing showed no significant group or age differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings support a distinction between automatic and purposive semantic processing.
    • NORM children rely more on purposive semantic processing than LD children.
    • Memory recall strategies differ based on learning disability status and age.