Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

C Elberling, M Don

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Cochlear Implants.

    Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
    Same author

    Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Acoustic Hearing Aids.

    Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
    Same author

    Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome due to banana: an uncommon entity.

    European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2013
    Same author

    Risk factors of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia.

    The European respiratory journal·2011
    Same author

    How to treat children's pneumonia: a complex problem.

    The European respiratory journal·2010
    Same author

    Alpha- and beta-secretase activity as a function of age and beta-amyloid in Down syndrome and normal brain.

    Neurobiology of aging·2006

    This study introduces a new method to assess auditory brainstem response (ABR) quality. It statistically evaluates signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to ensure reliable ABR testing results.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Neuroscience
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing relies on averaging sweeps to reduce noise.
    • Current protocols use a fixed number of sweeps, which doesn't guarantee consistent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to patient variability.
    • This limitation can affect the reliability of ABR results.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a statistical method for evaluating the quality or SNR of averaged ABR recordings.
    • To enable adaptive strategies for optimizing the number of sweeps in ABR testing.
    • To improve the cost-benefit analysis and efficiency of ABR assessments.

    Main Methods:

    • A novel method is proposed to statistically evaluate the 'quality' or SNR of averaged ABR.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • This involves calculating the ratio between the estimated ABR magnitude and the averaged background noise.
  • The method is designed for on-line, adaptive use to determine the necessary number of sweeps.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method provides a statistical measure of ABR quality (SNR).
    • It allows for adaptive determination of the optimal number of sweeps for reliable results.
    • The technique is applicable to both suprathreshold recordings and automatic threshold detection.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method offers a reliable way to assess ABR recording quality.
    • It facilitates adaptive ABR testing, ensuring a minimum SNR.
    • This approach enhances the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of ABR evaluations.