Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect

The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship describes the intricate link between drug exposure, efficacy, and toxicity, forming the foundation for optimal dosing regimens. This relationship uses mathematical modeling to characterize drug concentration-effect dynamics, ensuring precise therapeutic outcomes.Exposure represents the pharmacokinetic aspect of the PK-PD relationship, denoting the drug amount that elicits a biological response. It is typically quantified by administered...

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Dose to Pharmacological Effect

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Dose to Pharmacological Effect

A drug’s dosage and pharmacokinetic properties determine how quickly it acts, how intense its effects are, and how long it lasts. Higher doses increase drug concentration at receptor sites, producing a hyperbolic curve when pharmacologic response is plotted against drug dose. Converting this scale to a log-linear format results in a sigmoidal curve, better representing dose–response relationships.For drugs following a one-compartment model, the pharmacologic response is directly proportional to...

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Intensity of Dose-Effect Relationship

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Intensity of Dose-Effect Relationship

Pharmacodynamics explores the relationship between drug concentration and its effect. In a quantal response drug, the duration of action better correlates with drug concentration, while for graded effect drugs, the intensity of response is more relevant. This intensity depends on the dose, drug removal rate, and the region of the concentration–response curve.The concentration–response curve can be divided into three regions. Region 3 (80–100% maximum response) demonstrates that even as drug...

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nuclear industry: safety record.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1979

Same author

Bronchial deposition and clearance of aerosols.

Archives of internal medicine·1973

Same author

The regional deposition of inhaled aerosols in man.

Inhaled particles·1970

Same author

The effects of cigarette smoking on the kinetics of bronchial clearance in humans and donkeys.

Inhaled particles·1970

Same author

Tritium in the environment from nuclear powerplants.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1896)·1969

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

Regulatory implications of radiation dose-effect relationships.

|September 1, 1984

Summary

Extrapolating high-dose radiation effects to low doses depends on the chosen dose-effect model. Different models yield varying risk estimates, impacting radiation protection standards and strategies for individual versus collective dose management.

Area of Science:

Radiation Biology
Risk Assessment
Public Health

Background:

Estimating risks from ionizing radiation at low doses relies on extrapolations from high-dose data.
The choice of dose-effect relationship significantly influences these risk estimates and associated controversies.
The linear, non-threshold model has been the standard for extrapolation, but alternative models are being considered.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate how different dose-effect models impact risk estimation for low-dose ionizing radiation.
To explore the implications of various models on radiation protection standards and risk management strategies.
To compare the significance of individual versus collective dose considerations under different extrapolation models.

Main Methods:

Analysis of dose-effect relationships, including linear, dose-squared (D2), and fractional power (D1/m) models.

More Related Videos

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Extrapolation of risk estimates from high doses and dose rates to low doses and dose rates.

Comparison of predicted risks and implications for radiation protection standards based on model choice.

Main Results:

The dose-squared model predicts substantially lower risks at low doses compared to the linear model.
Fractional power models suggest that spreading dose over more individuals can increase overall health impact.
Linear quadratic and linear models show smaller differences at low doses, with both individual and collective dose being important.

Conclusions:

The choice of dose-effect model critically affects low-dose radiation risk assessment and protection strategies.
Considering collective dose reveals that reducing individual doses might sometimes increase collective dose, and vice-versa, depending on the model.
Different models necessitate distinct approaches to radiation protection, balancing individual and population-level risks.