Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of substrate composition on bone resorption by rabbit osteoclasts.

T J Chambers, B M Thomson, K Fuller

    Journal of Cell Science
    |August 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study investigated how the composition of bone substrates affects the resorption activity of osteoclasts. Researchers used slices of human femoral bone and rat calvaria surfaces to test different conditions. They found that osteoclasts resorbed bone only when in contact with mineral-rich substrates or surfaces treated with collagenase. Untreated or demineralized substrates did not trigger resorption. These findings suggest that direct contact with bone mineral is essential for osteoclast activity. The study also implies that osteoblasts may contribute to resorption by secreting collagenase, which removes barriers to mineral exposure. This work clarifies the role of mineral contact in initiating resorption and highlights the potential influence of osteoblast-secreted enzymes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Translating Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine Innovations to the Clinic through Interdisciplinary Commercial Translation Architecture.

    Journal of dental research·2021
    Same author

    Influence of Nonsulfated Polysaccharides on the Properties of Electrospun Poly(lactic-<i>co</i>-glycolic acid) Fibers.

    ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2021
    Same author

    Children's everyday exposure to food marketing: an objective analysis using wearable cameras.

    The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2017
    Same author

    Syndrome of Inappropriate Anti-Diuretic Hormone Secretion Secondary to Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.

    Transplantation proceedings·2017
    Same author

    Improving postural control through integration of sensory inputs and visual biofeedback.

    Topics in stroke rehabilitation·2016
    Same author

    TGF-α and IL-6 plasma levels selectively identify CML patients who fail to achieve an early molecular response or progress in the first year of therapy.

    Leukemia·2016

    Area of Science:

    • Bone biology within cellular physiology
    • Osteoclast function in skeletal medicine

    Background:

    The role of substrate composition in regulating osteoclast activity remains unclear. Prior research has shown that osteoclasts require specific bone surfaces to initiate resorption. However, the exact nature of the stimulus—whether mineral content, cellular interactions, or extracellular matrix—is not fully understood. This uncertainty drives the need for controlled experiments on different bone substrates. Existing studies suggest that osteoblasts may influence osteoclast behavior through secreted factors. Yet, the mechanism linking osteoblast activity to osteoclast resorption is still debated. This gap motivated the use of human and rat bone samples to test resorption patterns. No prior work had resolved whether mineral exposure or surface modification is essential. This study aims to clarify these unresolved questions through comparative substrate incubation.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    This study aimed to determine how substrate composition influences osteoclast resorption behavior. The specific problem addressed is whether osteoclasts require direct contact with bone mineral or if other surface modifications suffice. The motivation stems from conflicting evidence about osteoblast-osteoclast communication. By comparing untreated, demineralized, and anorganic bone substrates, the researchers sought to isolate the resorption stimulus. The study also examined rat calvaria surfaces to test collagenase effects. This approach allows for distinguishing between mineral-dependent and surface-dependent resorption. The goal is to identify whether mineral exposure or enzymatic modification is critical. This work could refine models of bone remodeling and resorption initiation.

    Keywords:
    osteoclast functionbone resorption mechanismsmineral surface interactionosteoblast-osteoclast communication

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The study found that osteoclasts resorb bone only when in contact with bone mineral, not with demineralized or untreated surfaces.

    Collagenase was used to digest the unmineralized lamina limitans, exposing bone mineral for osteoclast contact.

    Demineralized bone lacked the mineral component necessary for osteoclast resorption initiation.

    The endosteal surface provided a controlled substrate to test collagenase effects on resorption initiation.

    Resorption was measured by the extent and continuity of excavation tracts on bone surfaces.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    Human femoral cortical bone slices were prepared using a carborundum wheel. Osteoclasts were isolated from neonatal rabbit long bones and incubated on different substrates. Three substrate types were tested: untreated, demineralized, and anorganic bone. The researchers observed resorption patterns after incubation. Anorganic bone showed continuous excavation tracts, while untreated bone had discontinuous excavations. Demineralized bone showed no resorption. Rat calvaria endosteal surfaces were also tested. These surfaces were either untreated or incubated in collagenase. Bone resorption was assessed using surface excavation measurements. The experimental design allowed for comparing mineral versus surface effects. This method enabled distinguishing between mineral-dependent and enzymatic resorption triggers.

    Main Results:

    Anorganic bone substrates exhibited extensive, uninterrupted excavation after incubation. Untreated bone showed discontinuous excavations with smaller total volume. Demineralized bone did not show any resorption activity. The rat calvaria endosteal surface was tested in two conditions. Surfaces incubated in collagenase showed resorption. Untreated surfaces did not show resorption. These findings suggest that mineral contact is necessary for osteoclast activity. Collagenase treatment of rat calvaria surfaces enabled resorption. Untreated rat calvaria surfaces failed to initiate resorption. The results indicate that mineral exposure is a key stimulus for osteoclasts. These outcomes support the hypothesis that osteoblast-secreted collagenase may be involved in resorption initiation.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that osteoclasts require direct contact with bone mineral to initiate resorption. This conclusion is based on the lack of resorption on demineralized substrates. Anorganic bone substrates showed extensive resorption, supporting this claim. The rat calvaria experiments further reinforce this idea. Collagenase-treated surfaces allowed resorption, while untreated surfaces did not. The authors suggest that osteoblast-secreted collagenase may be involved. This enzyme could digest the lamina limitans, exposing mineral surfaces. The findings imply that mineral contact is a primary stimulus for osteoclasts. These conclusions are drawn directly from the observed resorption patterns. No generalizations beyond the study's scope are made.

    The authors propose that osteoblasts may induce resorption by secreting collagenase, which exposes bone mineral.