Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Luria left in the lurch: unfulfilled promises are not valid tests
Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
|November 1, 1984
Summary
The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) faces criticism regarding its clinical utility. This commentary argues against further research by neuropsychologists, placing responsibility on test creators.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Psychological Assessment
Background:
- The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) is a controversial clinical tool.
- Criticisms question the LNNB's theoretical and applied research basis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To dispute the necessity of further LNNB research by neuropsychologists.
- To clarify responsibility for LNNB research and validation.
Main Methods:
- Commentary on existing literature and professional responsibilities.
- Analysis of the implications of clinical tool criticism.
Main Results:
- The need for further LNNB research by practicing neuropsychologists is disputed.
- Responsibility for research and validation lies with the test author and publisher.
Conclusions:
- Neuropsychologists are not obligated to conduct further research on the LNNB.
- Clinical practice may discontinue the use of the LNNB without requiring further validation studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:40The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
01:29Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
01:14Errors In Hypothesis Tests
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
01:17Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
01:20Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...