Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting frequency selectivity in forward masking from simultaneous masking.

R A Lutfi

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |October 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Auditory frequency selectivity is sharper in forward masking than simultaneous masking. A simple model using Weber's law explains this difference, suggesting no need for extra tuning mechanisms in auditory perception.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Simultaneous relative cue reliance in speech-on-speech masking.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
    Same author

    Auditory detection of hollowness.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
    Same author

    Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
    Same author

    Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
    Same author

    Informational masking by everyday sounds.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
    Same author

    Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoacoustics
    • Auditory Perception
    • Signal Processing

    Background:

    • Frequency selectivity measures differ between forward and simultaneous masking paradigms.
    • Existing interpretations propose additional auditory tuning mechanisms to explain these differences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if a unified model can explain the observed differences in frequency selectivity.
    • To test a multiplicative relationship between forward and simultaneous masking based on Weber's law.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized psychoacoustic measures of forward and simultaneous masking.
    • Applied a multiplicative model incorporating Weber's law to relate masking changes across frequency and time separations.

    Main Results:

    • A simple multiplicative model accurately predicted the observed differences in frequency selectivity.
    • The model assumes changes in masking follow Weber's law across different masker-signal separations.

    Conclusions:

    • The limits of auditory frequency selectivity are established within simultaneous masking.
    • Additional, specialized tuning mechanisms are not required to account for the discrepancy between forward and simultaneous masking measures.

    Related Experiment Videos