Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.

G T Bennett, A F Sullwold

    Journal of Forensic Sciences
    |October 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Colliding pulse mode-locked dye laser stabilization using an intracavity spectral filter.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Qualifying the psychiatrist as a lay witness: a reaction to the American Psychiatric Association petition in Barefoot v. Estelle.

    Journal of forensic sciences·1985
    Same author

    A comparison of alcoholics' and nonalcoholics' causal attributions for drinking behavior.

    The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse·1982
    Same author

    The generality of the stimulus-binding hypothesis across drinking behavior and task performance in alcoholics.

    Addictive behaviors·1982
    Same author

    Attributions of causality for drinking behavior made by alcoholics and by normal drinkers.

    Drug and alcohol dependence·1981
    Same journal

    GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

    Journal of forensic sciences·2026
    See all related articles

    Determining a defendant's mental competence requires evaluating their specific functional abilities within legal proceedings. Courts should consider mental state for fundamental fairness, not just clinical labels.

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Psychology
    • Legal Psychology
    • Criminal Law

    Background:

    • The legal standard for defendant competence is established by Dusky v. United States, focusing on minimum rationality.
    • Existing instruments aim to aid clinicians in assessing competence, but competence is context-specific.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify the functional and context-determinative nature of legal competence.
    • To guide evaluators in assessing defendants' abilities relevant to specific legal functions.

    Main Methods:

    • The abstract outlines a conceptual approach rather than empirical methods.
    • It emphasizes the need for evaluators to gather specific functional information.
    • Assessment should focus on measurable skills aligned with expected legal functions.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Competence is functional and context-dependent, not solely a clinical determination.
    • Evaluators must link assessments to specific functional requirements of legal proceedings.

    Conclusions:

    • The court, not mental health professionals, makes the final legal decision on competence.
    • The ultimate criterion is "fundamental fairness" considering the defendant's mental state and functional capacity.