Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling
Published on: March 20, 2018
Epigenetic carcinogens: problems with identification and risk estimation
Abstract:
The mechanisms of carcinogenesis are just beginning to be understood. There is recent interest in the broad classification of carcinogens into two categories based upon their mechanism of action: those that interact with DNA via a genetic mechanism are termed genetic carcinogens; and those that do not directly interact with DNA, but may cause changes in DNA tertiary structure or methylation patterns, and are termed epigenetic carcinogens. Present knowledge is inadequate to justify separate risk assessment methods for genetic vs. epigenetic carcinogens. Quantitative estimates of carcinogenic risk are currently best made using non-threshold models.
Insights
Understanding carcinogenesis mechanisms is crucial. Carcinogens are classified as genetic or epigenetic, but current risk assessment methods are insufficient for separate evaluation, favoring non-threshold models.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Toxicology
Background:
- Carcinogenesis mechanisms are complex and not fully understood.
- Carcinogens are increasingly classified by their action: genetic (DNA interaction) vs. epigenetic (indirect DNA alteration).
- Current knowledge gaps limit distinct risk assessment for these categories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding of carcinogen classification based on mechanisms.
- To evaluate the adequacy of existing risk assessment methods for genetic and epigenetic carcinogens.
- To inform future approaches in quantitative carcinogenic risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on carcinogen classification and risk assessment models.
- Analysis of the distinction between genetic and epigenetic carcinogen action.
- Evaluation of non-threshold models for quantitative risk estimation.
Main Results:
- Carcinogens can be broadly categorized into genetic and epigenetic types based on DNA interaction.
- Epigenetic carcinogens may alter DNA tertiary structure or methylation patterns without direct DNA binding.
- Existing knowledge is insufficient to support separate risk assessment methodologies for genetic versus epigenetic carcinogens.
Conclusions:
- A unified approach to risk assessment is currently most appropriate.
- Quantitative carcinogenic risk estimation is best performed using non-threshold models.
- Further research is needed to refine the understanding and assessment of epigenetic carcinogens.
More Related Videos
12:15Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: May 29, 2019
04:12Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate (DMBA-TPA)
Published on: December 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity