Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Epigenetic carcinogens: problems with identification and risk estimation.

K Hooper

    Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Residential indoor PM2.5 in wood stove homes: follow-up of the Libby changeout program.

    Indoor air·2012
    Same author

    Circadian activity associated with spatial learning and memory in aging rhesus monkeys.

    Experimental neurology·2009
    Same author

    Results of a residential indoor PM2.5 sampling program before and after a woodstove changeout.

    Indoor air·2008
    Same author

    Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotides enhance the cytotoxicity of chlorambucil in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells.

    Leukemia & lymphoma·2001
    Same author

    Effect of essential amino acids on mouse embryo viability and ammonium production.

    Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2001
    Same author

    The PBDEs: an emerging environmental challenge and another reason for breast-milk monitoring programs.

    Environmental health perspectives·2000
    Same journal

    Ingestion of high-dose buprenorphine by a 4 year-old child.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    Same journal

    A reassessment of topical organic phosphorus insecticide exposures and permanent paralysis.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    Same journal

    Methamphetamine toxicity secondary to intravaginal body stuffing.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    Same journal

    Duodenal perforation after ibuprofen overdose.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    Same journal

    Delayed dystonia following pimozide overdose in a child.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    Same journal

    Pattern of acute poisonings in Mashhad, Iran 1993-2000.

    Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2005
    See all related articles

    Understanding carcinogenesis mechanisms is crucial. Carcinogens are classified as genetic or epigenetic, but current risk assessment methods are insufficient for separate evaluation, favoring non-threshold models.

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Molecular Biology
    • Toxicology

    Background:

    • Carcinogenesis mechanisms are complex and not fully understood.
    • Carcinogens are increasingly classified by their action: genetic (DNA interaction) vs. epigenetic (indirect DNA alteration).
    • Current knowledge gaps limit distinct risk assessment for these categories.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the current understanding of carcinogen classification based on mechanisms.
    • To evaluate the adequacy of existing risk assessment methods for genetic and epigenetic carcinogens.
    • To inform future approaches in quantitative carcinogenic risk assessment.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review on carcinogen classification and risk assessment models.
    • Analysis of the distinction between genetic and epigenetic carcinogen action.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of non-threshold models for quantitative risk estimation.

    • Main Results:

    • Carcinogens can be broadly categorized into genetic and epigenetic types based on DNA interaction.
    • Epigenetic carcinogens may alter DNA tertiary structure or methylation patterns without direct DNA binding.
    • Existing knowledge is insufficient to support separate risk assessment methodologies for genetic versus epigenetic carcinogens.

    Conclusions:

    • A unified approach to risk assessment is currently most appropriate.
    • Quantitative carcinogenic risk estimation is best performed using non-threshold models.
    • Further research is needed to refine the understanding and assessment of epigenetic carcinogens.