Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of a concurrent counting task on dynamic visual accommodation.

F V Malmstrom, R J Randle

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |September 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Responses of myopes to volitional control training of accommodation.

    Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·1988
    Same author

    Age, degraded viewing environments, and the speed of accommodation.

    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1986
    Same author

    The effects of task performance on ocular accommodation and perceived size.

    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1985
    Same author

    What you thought you knew about motion sickness isn't necessarily so.

    Flying safety (Washington, D.C. : 1981)·1984
    Same author

    Restriction of pursuit eye movement range during a concurrent auditory task.

    The Journal of applied psychology·1983
    Same author

    The visual accommodation response during concurrent mental activity.

    Perception & psychophysics·1980
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Concurrent mental tasks increase visual accommodation errors. This study found that adding a counting task to a visual focus test resulted in a consistent lag in accommodation, indicating reduced visual precision during dual-tasking.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology and Vision Science
    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Human Factors

    Background:

    • Visual accommodation is crucial for clear vision, involving the eye's ability to change focus.
    • Concurrent mental tasks can potentially interfere with physiological processes like accommodation.
    • Understanding these interactions is vital for fields ranging from optometry to human-computer interaction.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of a concurrent mental task on visual accommodation.
    • To quantify changes in accommodative accuracy under dual-task conditions.
    • To explore the relationship between mental workload and visual system performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Objective, continuous recording of visual accommodation using an infrared optometer.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Four male subjects performed a sinusoidal focus stimulus task (0.0 to 3.0 D).
  • A concurrent counting task was introduced to assess its effect on accommodation.

    • Main Results:

    • A consistent increase in steady-state accommodative error, specifically a lag of 0.25 to 0.50 D, was observed.
    • The magnitude of this accommodative lag remained stable across tested frequencies (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 Hz).
    • These findings suggest a quantifiable effect of mental workload on visual accommodation.

    Conclusions:

    • Concurrent mental tasks induce a significant accommodative lag, impairing visual focus accuracy.
    • The results support an accommodative lag model linked to sympathetic-parasympathetic arousal from mental tasks.
    • This highlights the interplay between cognitive load and the visual system's dynamic response.