Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of techniques to determine continence zone.

A G Toguri, M M Wood, B M Churchill

    The Journal of Urology
    |April 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing three methods for analyzing urethral pressure profiles, the weight and planimetry techniques showed the best agreement for assessing the continence zone in patients. Statistical analysis revealed differences among methods, particularly for larger continence areas.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Estimation of glomerular filtration rate and bladder capacity: the effect of maturation, ageing, gender and size.

    BJU international·2003
    Same author

    Pediatric urine testing.

    Pediatric clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Enuresis.

    Pediatric clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Dysfunctional elimination syndrome in children without obvious spinal cord diseases.

    Pediatric clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Dysfunction of the lower urinary and distal gastrointestinal tracts in pediatric patients with known spinal cord problems.

    Pediatric clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Prototype system for enhancing cystometric analysis with special emphasis on the pediatric population.

    Journal of endourology·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Female Pelvic Medicine
    • Urodynamics

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of urethral pressure profiles is crucial for diagnosing and managing urinary incontinence.
    • The continence zone, a key parameter in urethral pressure profilometry, can be quantified using various analytical techniques.
    • Understanding the agreement between different quantification methods is essential for reliable clinical assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the agreement of three distinct methods (triangle, planimeter, weight) for quantifying the urethral continence zone from pressure profiles.
    • To evaluate the statistical and graphical concordance between these measurement techniques.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of urethral pressure profiles from 36 patients.
    • Quantification of the continence zone area using three methods: triangle, planimeter, and weight.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Graphical and statistical comparison of the results obtained from the different techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Graphical analysis indicated the best agreement between the weight and planimetry methods.
    • Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the three techniques.
    • The discrepancy among methods was less pronounced in the subgroup of patients with the smallest continence area.

    Conclusions:

    • The weight and planimetry methods offer comparable graphical results for assessing the urethral continence zone.
    • Significant statistical differences exist between the analyzed techniques, suggesting potential variability in clinical application.
    • Methodological choice may impact results, especially in patients with larger continence zones, highlighting the need for careful interpretation.