Related Experiment Videos
Reproducibility of ventricular function measurements by contrast angiography
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
|January 1, 1984
Summary
Contrast angiography measurements for cardiac volumes show moderate interobserver reproducibility. Manual calculations in clinical settings had higher variability than digital methods in selected patients, suggesting caution when comparing methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Diagnostics
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate measurement of cardiac volumes is crucial for diagnosing and managing cardiovascular diseases.
- Contrast angiography is a widely used imaging technique for assessing cardiac function.
- Understanding the reproducibility of these measurements is essential for reliable clinical interpretation and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of single-plane contrast angiographic measurements of cardiac volumes.
- To compare reproducibility between manual and digital calculation methods.
- To assess the impact of patient selection and filming technique on measurement variability.
Main Methods:
- Two patient groups were studied: a consecutive clinical series (n=42) with manual calculations and a selected group (n=31) with digital calculations.
- Measurements included end-diastolic volume (EDV/m2), end-systolic volume (ESV/m2), stroke volume (SV/m2), and ejection fraction (EF).
- Statistical analysis included correlation coefficients, standard error of the estimate, average difference, and 95% confidence limits.
Main Results:
- Measurement variation accounted for 9-15% of the variance in end-diastolic volume (EDV/m2) for the consecutive series.
- Digital calculations in the selected group demonstrated improved interobserver reproducibility compared to manual methods.
- Reproducibility of regional ejection fractions was also assessed in the selected group.
Conclusions:
- Single-plane contrast angiography exhibits moderate interobserver reproducibility for cardiac volume measurements.
- Digital calculation methods enhance reproducibility, making them preferable for investigational purposes.
- Caution is advised when comparing contrast angiographic measurements with other methods due to inherent measurement variation.