Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The microneedleholderscissors and the microforceps.

E R Owen

    Microsurgery
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Two novel Australian microsurgical instruments, a microneedleholder/scissors and microforceps, simplify microanastomosis. These ergonomic tools reduce procedure time and eliminate the need for assistants and specialized microscopes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The perimedian incision.

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
    Same author

    Human hand transplantation: what have we learned?

    Transplantation proceedings·2004
    Same author

    Experimental limb transplantation, part I: identification of an effective tapered triple combination immunosuppressive regime.

    Transplantation proceedings·2004
    Same author

    Experimental limb transplantation, part II: excellent return of function and indefinite survival after withdrawal of immunosuppression.

    Transplantation proceedings·2004
    Same author

    Hand transplantation: ethics, immunosuppression and indications.

    Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2002
    Same author

    What is happening with hand transplants.

    Lancet (London, England)·2001
    Same journal

    Symani-Assisted Microsurgery in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Indications, Techniques, and Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

    Microsurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Proposing Objective 3D Facial Surface Scanning to Evaluate Surgical Outcomes in Facial Lymphedema.

    Microsurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Closure of Tracheoesophageal Fistula Employing the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP) Flap: Report of Three Cases.

    Microsurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Umbilical Inset Incision Type Influences Abdominal Donor Site Healing in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

    Microsurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the Efficacy and Utility of Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography in Perforator Flap Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Microsurgery·2026
    Same journal

    Recipient Vessel Selection in Free Flap Phalloplasty: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

    Microsurgery·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Instrumentation
    • Microsurgery Technology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Microsurgery, particularly microanastomosis, demands specialized instruments and skilled personnel.
    • Current techniques often require extensive equipment, including double-operating microscopes and assistants, increasing complexity and cost.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce and describe two innovative Australian-designed microsurgical instruments.
    • To evaluate the utility of these instruments in simplifying microanastomosis procedures for small vessels, tubes, and nerves.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a combination microneedleholder and scissors.
    • Design of a versatile microforceps.
    • Ergonomic design considerations for penholder hand grip.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of instrument performance in microanastomosis without additional equipment.

    • Main Results:

    • The combination instrument and microforceps enable microanastomosis with a single instrument in each hand.
    • Ergonomic design facilitates ease of use and reduces procedural time.
    • Eliminates the requirement for a skilled assistant and a double-operating microscope.

    Conclusions:

    • These novel Australian instruments significantly streamline the microanastomosis process.
    • The design offers a cost-effective and efficient solution for microsurgical procedures.
    • Potential to improve accessibility and reduce training barriers in microsurgery.