Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adherence measures and their utility.

J Dunbar

    Controlled Clinical Trials
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Researchers can choose from various adherence measures, including markers. The study suggests that the research question should guide the selection of adherence definitions and assessment methods for accurate results.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recommendations for promoting healthier lifestyles in postpartum women after gestational diabetes.

    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
    Same author

    Haemoglobin scavenging after subarachnoid haemorrhage.

    Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2014
    Same author

    ABangle: characterising the VH-VL orientation in antibodies.

    Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2013
    Same author

    A CASE OF SEPTICAEMIC MENINGITIS, WITH RECOVERY.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    THE TREATMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS BY INTERSTITIAL INJECTIONS.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    THE TREATMENT OF VARICOSE VEINS OF THE LEG BY INJECTIONS.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same journal

    On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    Same journal

    Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Controlled clinical trials·2004
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Pharmacology
    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of patient adherence is crucial for clinical research.
    • Various adherence assessment methods exist, each with limitations.
    • Biomarkers and self-report are common adherence measures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review available adherence measures for researchers.
    • To evaluate the utility and limitations of adherence markers.
    • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate adherence assessment methodologies.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of adherence measurement techniques.
    • Comparative analysis of different adherence assessment tools.
    • Discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Adherence measures vary in the information they provide and their limitations.
    • Markers offer insights into recent adherence but lack quantitative data and can be affected by confounding factors.
    • The research question's nature should inform the choice of adherence definition and assessment method.

    Conclusions:

    • Markers are valuable for validating self-reports and confirming recent medication intake.
    • No single adherence measure is universally superior; method selection depends on research objectives.
    • A combination of methods may provide a more comprehensive understanding of adherence over time.