Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Hemiretinal differences in face recognition: accuracy versus reaction time.

R E Proudfoot

    Brain and Cognition
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study found that nasal visual fields are faster for face recognition, while temporal visual fields are more accurate. These hemiretinal differences may complicate interpreting brain processing using both eyes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hemispheric asymmetry for face recognition: cognitive style and the "crossover" effect.

    Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·1983
    Same author

    Hemispheric asymmetry for face recognition: some effects of visual masking, hemiretinal stimulation and learning task.

    Neuropsychologia·1982
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception
    • Cognitive Psychology

    Background:

    • Hemiretinal differences in visual processing can influence perception.
    • Understanding these differences is crucial for interpreting brain activity related to vision.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate hemiretinal advantages in face recognition.
    • To explore how these effects interact with eye dominance.

    Main Methods:

    • Monocular presentation of laterally displaced facial stimuli.
    • Measurement of reaction time and accuracy (d') for correct identifications.

    Main Results:

    • A nasal hemiretinal advantage was observed for reaction time in face recognition.
    • A temporal hemiretinal advantage was found for accuracy (d').

    Conclusions:

    • Hemiretinal processing differences exist for face recognition.
    • These findings suggest that eye dominance and hemiretinal effects can complicate interpretations of hemispheric processing derived from binocular stimulation.

    Related Experiment Videos