The stable internal fixation of peritrochanteric hip fractures

Most series found in the literature on peritrochanteric fractures report failure rates of 9% to 35% for nonsliding fixation and 5% to 12% for devices that allow collapse about the axis of the barrel of the device, indicating that the concept of load sharing is a valid principle in the management of these injuries. Reviewing our experience with the fully collapsible devices reveals a remarkably low incidence of complications related to both metal failure and postoperative penetration of the femoral head. Most of the failures in our series occurred before the routine use of fluoroscopic operative placement control and can be related to inadvertent intraoperative penetration of the femoral head. With modern techniques, therefore, these complications are largely preventable. Despite those failures, which cannot be explained by technical error, we are extremely pleased with our overall results because the fully collapsible devices appear to allow early weight bearing without fear of fixation complications, even in unstable fractures. This concept allows for easier postoperative rehabilitation and attendant diminished mortality rates as compared with other devices currently used. Although no study can conclusively demonstrate the clear superiority of the slotted Richards screw and Ken-Pugh nail over other forms of sliding fixation, we believe that if the concept of load sharing is valid, this modification is a simple, sensible, and effective addition to most nail plate devices used today.