Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current distributions in cochlear stimulation.

R C Black, G M Clark, Y C Tong

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of terephthalamidine (NSC 57155) as a 120-hour continuous infusion.

    Investigational new drugs·1998
    Same author

    Chronic study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the cat following electrical stimulation.

    Acta oto-laryngologica·1998
    Same author

    Studies of prosody perception by cochlear implant patients.

    Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology·1998
    Same author

    Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay-detected p53 protein accumulation: a prognostic factor in a large breast cancer cohort.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·1998
    Same author

    Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1998
    Same author

    Intracellular responses of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus to intracochlear electrical stimulation.

    Brain research bulletin·1998
    Same journal

    Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    Same journal

    LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    Same journal

    DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Synchrony and Reciprocity in Rhythmic Interaction.

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
    See all related articles

    Pseudobipolar stimulation offers improved current localization compared to monopolar methods. This reduces electrical interaction between channels, enhancing precision in neurostimulation applications.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Neuroscience
    • Electrical Engineering

    Background:

    • Monopolar and bipolar stimulation exhibit distinct current spread characteristics.
    • Understanding current distribution is crucial for optimizing neurostimulation electrode design.
    • Previous studies established length constants for bipolar and monopolar stimulation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate current distribution and localization for pseudobipolar stimulation.
    • To compare pseudobipolar stimulation with bipolar and monopolar techniques.
    • To evaluate the impact of electrode impedance on current spread in cochlear implants.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized saline-solution-filled tube models to analyze radial and longitudinal current distribution.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Performed experiments with pseudobipolar electrode arrays in human cochlea models.
  • Measured electrode ground impedance and cochlear tissue impedances.

    • Main Results:

    • Pseudobipolar stimulation demonstrated comparable current localization to bipolar stimulation within a 6-10 dB range.
    • Coincident pseudobipolar stimulation suppressed current between maxima and enhanced it at edges, reducing interaction.
    • High electrode ground impedance in cochlear models led to significant current spread along the ground electrode.

    Conclusions:

    • Pseudobipolar stimulation provides localized current delivery, similar to bipolar stimulation.
    • Reduced stimulus interaction with coincident pseudobipolar stimulation is beneficial for multi-channel applications.
    • Electrode ground impedance significantly influences current spread, impacting stimulation efficacy in cochlear implants.