Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adhesive membrane device (Op-site) for skin closure in general surgery.

D B Innes

    The New Zealand Medical Journal
    |October 26, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study evaluated an adhesive membrane device for skin closure in 60 general surgery patients. While not universally applicable, it offered comparable cost, good cosmetic outcomes for transverse wounds, and patient-friendly removal.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Rubber band ligation for haemorrhoids.

    The New Zealand medical journal·1981
    Same author

    Shotgun injuries in South Auckland.

    The New Zealand medical journal·1981
    Same author

    The prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis by metronidazole and cefazolin: a controlled double blind trial.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·1980
    Same author

    Abdominal tuberculosis in Kathmandu, Nepal.

    The New Zealand medical journal·1976
    Same author

    Metronidazole in prevention and treatment of bacteroides infections after appendicectomy.

    British medical journal·1976
    Same author

    Calcium fluoride in amalgam for caries prevention.

    Journal of dental research·1966

    Area of Science:

    • General Surgery
    • Wound Management
    • Medical Devices

    Background:

    • Traditional skin closure methods like sutures can lead to complications and require follow-up for removal.
    • The need for alternative, patient-friendly wound closure techniques is ongoing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy and applicability of an adhesive membrane device (Op-site) for skin closure in general surgical cases.
    • To compare the device with traditional skin sutures regarding cost, cosmetic results, and complication rates.

    Main Methods:

    • A prospective study of 60 general surgical patients utilizing the Op-site adhesive membrane device for skin closure.
    • Detailed description of the application technique for the adhesive membrane device.
    • Assessment of wound complications and cosmetic outcomes.

    Main Results:

    • The adhesive membrane device was successfully applied in the majority of cases, though limitations were noted for vertical wound closure.
    • Thirteen cases experienced minor wound complications.
    • Cosmetic results were generally good, particularly for transverse wounds.
    • The device's cost was comparable to skin sutures.
    • Patient self-removal avoided post-discharge suture removal issues.

    Conclusions:

    • The adhesive membrane device is a viable option for skin closure in select general surgical wounds, offering cosmetic and patient convenience benefits.
    • Limitations in applicability and vertical wound closure require consideration.
    • Further research may explore optimizing its use in diverse wound types.

    Related Experiment Videos