Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparative evaluation of disposable humidifiers.

C Mebius

    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
    |October 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    New hygroscopic condenser humidifiers (HCH) outperform conventional heat and moisture exchangers (HME), providing superior humidification for dry inspired gases. These devices are recommended for extended use, even with dry gases, due to their efficiency and safety.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Management of minor head injuries in emergency departments in Sweden. Time for a new strategy?

    The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica·2000
    Same author

    Public disclosure of health care performance reports: comments and reflections from Sweden.

    International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·1999
    Same author

    [Tooth injuries in connection with intubation anesthesia: severity of the disease and dental status].

    Lakartidningen·1998
    Same author

    A new colorimetric breath indicator (Colibri). A comparison of the performance of two carbon dioxide indicators.

    Anaesthesia·1994
    Same author

    Heat and moisture exchangers with bacterial filters: a laboratory evaluation.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·1992
    Same author

    Neonatal hygroscopic condenser humidifier.

    Critical care medicine·1987

    Area of Science:

    • Respiratory care
    • Biomedical engineering
    • Medical device evaluation

    Background:

    • Effective humidification of inspired gases is crucial for respiratory patients.
    • Conventional heat and moisture exchangers (HME) have limitations in delivering adequate humidity.
    • Hygroscopic condenser humidifiers (HCH) represent a newer technology for gas humidification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the performance of commercially available hygroscopic condenser humidifiers (HCH) and conventional heat and moisture exchangers (HME).
    • To compare the humidification capabilities of HCH and HME devices under laboratory and clinical conditions.
    • To assess the suitability of HCH devices for extended use with dry inspired gases.

    Main Methods:

    • Laboratory testing of four HCH and two HME devices.
    • Clinical study to validate laboratory findings.
    • Evaluation of humidification efficiency, dead space, resistance, and weight.

    Main Results:

    • HCH devices demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional HME units.
    • HCH devices delivered moisture levels comparable to normal nasal breathing, even with dry gases.
    • Humidification efficiency decreased with increasing tidal volume, but the best units supported volumes up to 1000-1500 ml.
    • HCH devices exhibited low dead space (90-100 ml) and resistance (approx. 50 Pa at 0.5 L/s), with weights of 18-40 g.
    • One HCH device showed antimicrobial properties, while others did not promote organism growth.

    Conclusions:

    • Hygroscopic condenser humidifiers are a highly effective alternative to conventional humidification techniques.
    • HCH devices can be safely recommended for extended use, providing adequate humidification for dry gases.
    • The safety, simplicity, and potential antimicrobial properties of HCH devices enhance their clinical utility.

    Related Experiment Videos