Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Uncertainty in cephalometrics.

British Journal of Orthodontics

|January 1, 1984

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates measurement techniques for cephalometric error, assessing digitizer use on tracings, untraced films, and modified tracings for reproducible cephalometric angles and coordinates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fixing the problem.

British dental journal·2003

Same author

On the mechanism of post-splenectomy leukocytosis in mice.

European journal of clinical investigation·2003

Same author

Results after rectal cancer resection with in-continuity partial vaginectomy and total mesorectal excision.

Annals of surgical oncology·2003

Same author

Resection of locally recurrent colorectal cancer in the presence of distant metastases: can it be justified?

Annals of surgical oncology·2003

Same author

Classification of lymphoproliferative disorders by spectral imaging of the nucleus.

Histology and histopathology·2002

Same author

Preoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy and full-thickness transanal excision for selected T2 and T3 distal rectal cancers.

International journal of colorectal disease·2002

Same journal

The bedfordshire PDS orthodontic pilot.

British journal of orthodontics·1999

Same journal

Reviews and abstracts

British journal of orthodontics·1999

Same journal

Re: Forestadent travel award.

British journal of orthodontics·1999

Same journal

Re: Orthologic 'A' company award for 1997.

British journal of orthodontics·1999

Same journal

Digital cameras.

British journal of orthodontics·1999

Same journal

Cortical bone screws for maxillomandibular fixation in orthognathic surgery.

British journal of orthodontics·1999

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Dentistry
Orthodontics
Radiology

Background:

Cephalometric analysis is crucial in orthodontics for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Accurate measurements are essential for reliable cephalometric analysis.
Various methods exist for cephalometric analysis, each with potential sources of error.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify and analyze sources of error in cephalometric analysis.
To compare the reproducibility of different cephalometric measurement techniques.
To evaluate the impact of digitizer use on tracing, untraced films, and modified tracings.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on cephalometric error sources.
Experimental evaluation of measurement reproducibility using a digitizer.

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of cephalometric angle and coordinate measurements across different tracing methods (traced, untraced, modified).

Main Results:

Different measurement techniques exhibit varying degrees of reproducibility.
The use of a digitizer on tracings shows specific impacts on measurement accuracy.
Untraced films and modified tracings present distinct error profiles compared to standard tracings.

Conclusions:

Understanding sources of cephalometric error is vital for accurate clinical application.
The choice of measurement technique significantly influences the reproducibility of cephalometric analysis.
Digitizer use and tracing modifications require careful consideration to minimize cephalometric error.