Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method of cephalometric evaluation.

J A McNamara

    American Journal of Orthodontics
    |December 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study presents a cephalometric analysis method for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. It details evaluating jaw and incisor positions using single or serial films for treatment planning.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation in adults.

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2017
    Same author

    Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

    Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2017
    Same author

    Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: A predictor of maxillary protraction? Part I - A classification method.

    Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2017
    Same author

    Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment.

    Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2017
    Same author

    Lateral cephalometric standards of Germans with normal occlusion from 6 to 17 years of age.

    Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie·2013
    Same author

    Patient-initiated second medical opinions: their necessity and economic cost.

    Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
    Same journal

    Recent advances in bacterial chemotherapy; the sulfonamides.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    Same journal

    Factors modifying head form in man.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    Same journal

    The advisability of extraction as a therapeutic aid in orthodontics; affirmative.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    Same journal

    Lesions of the mandible; secondary carcinoma of the mandible.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    Same journal

    Salivary gland tumors.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    Same journal

    Extensive ameloblastoma.

    American journal of orthodontics·2010
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Dentistry
    • Orthodontics
    • Craniofacial Surgery

    Background:

    • Cephalometric analysis is crucial for diagnosing and planning orthodontic and orthognathic surgery.
    • Accurate assessment of maxillomandibular and incisor positions is essential for successful treatment outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe a comprehensive cephalometric analysis method for evaluating craniofacial structures.
    • To provide criteria and standards for assessing the anteroposterior and vertical positions of the maxilla, mandible, and incisors.
    • To outline a step-by-step procedure for both single and serial cephalometric film analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • The described method involves relating the maxilla and mandible to cranial structures and each other using a single cephalometric film.
    • Specific criteria are established for evaluating the anteroposterior and vertical positions of the upper and lower incisors.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The analysis of serial films is also considered, with a detailed procedural outline provided.

    • Main Results:

    • The paper provides a standardized method for cephalometric analysis.
    • It offers clear criteria for evaluating key skeletal and dental relationships.
    • The method facilitates objective assessment for treatment planning.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented cephalometric analysis method offers a systematic approach for evaluating orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.
    • It provides a reliable framework for treatment planning based on precise measurements of craniofacial structures and incisor positions.
    • The method is applicable to both single and serial cephalometric analyses.