Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Residency Review Committee for Radiology: its organization, function, and performance in diagnostic radiology.

R H Sebring, H G Jacobson

    AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
    |April 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Radiology Residency Review Committee approved most programs between 1975-1981. Key deficiencies included inadequate subspecialty training, teaching, and staffing, with nuclear radiology training growing significantly.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Practice patterns in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

    Pediatrics·1998
    Same author

    Quality improvement: an ACQIP exercise on telephone advice.

    Pediatrics in review·1997
    Same author

    Quality improvement: an ACQIP exercise on the management of otitis media.

    Pediatrics in review·1996
    Same author

    The political anatomy of a guideline: a collaborative effort to develop the AHCPR-sponsored practice guideline on otitis media with effusion.

    The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·1996
    Same author

    Chest pain in a debilitated postoperative patient.

    Chest·1991
    Same author

    Radiology.

    JAMA·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Radiology Training Accreditation

    Background:

    • The Residency Review Committee for Radiology oversees accreditation for radiology training programs.
    • Understanding the committee's system and recent actions is crucial for program evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the accreditation system and recent actions of the Radiology Residency Review Committee.
    • To analyze deficiencies leading to adverse actions in radiology training programs.
    • To identify trends in radiology training program numbers and trainee demographics.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of accreditation decisions for new and continuing radiology programs from 1975-1981.
    • Analysis of common deficiencies cited in adverse accreditation actions.
    • Examination of trends in program numbers and trainee demographics over a 5-year period.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Most program applications (1975-1981) were approved.
    • Common deficiencies included inadequate subspecialty clinical experience, formal teaching, and program staffing.
    • Diagnostic radiology trainee numbers increased 13%, radiation therapy remained unchanged, and nuclear radiology training opportunities significantly expanded.
    • The proportion of women trainees in diagnostic radiology rose from 15% to 22%, while foreign graduate trainees decreased from 19% to 11%.

    Conclusions:

    • Radiology training program accreditation is a structured process with specific criteria.
    • Addressing deficiencies in clinical experience, teaching, and staffing is vital for program quality.
    • Nuclear radiology is a growing subspecialty, while diagnostic radiology shows increased trainee numbers and diversity.