Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Magnification in cholangiography.

D M Nichols, H J Burhenne

    AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
    |May 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Radiographic imaging of the bile duct is subject to magnification errors. Understanding magnification factors is crucial for accurate measurements of bile duct stones and other structures.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Not Available].

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
    Same author

    Medical imaging: how to get the best radiological consult in 1986.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
    Same author

    Alimentary tract imaging.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
    Same author

    Diagnostic role of ultrasonography and direct cholangiography.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Measurement of defect angle in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

    Clinical radiology·2009
    Same author

    Re: Multimodality preoperative imaging of pancreatic insulinomas.

    Clinical radiology·2006
    Same journal

    The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    Same journal

    From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Magnification in radiographic imaging of the bile duct is often overlooked.
    • Discrepancies in size measurements can arise from varying magnification.
    • Accurate dimensional analysis is critical for clinical decision-making.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To quantify the magnification factor in fluoroscopic spot films of the bile duct.
    • To compare this magnification with that of conventional intravenous cholangiography.
    • To highlight the importance of reporting magnification in radiographic measurements.

    Main Methods:

    • Measurement of 22 freshly extracted common bile duct stones.
    • Analysis of magnification on fluoroscopic spot films.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison with accepted magnification in intravenous cholangiography.

    • Main Results:

    • An average magnification factor of 1.43 (43%) was determined for fluoroscopic spot films.
    • This is higher than the generally accepted 1.3 (30%) for conventional intravenous cholangiography.
    • Significant size discrepancies can be attributed to these magnification differences.

    Conclusions:

    • The magnification factor in bile duct imaging, particularly fluoroscopy, is substantial and requires attention.
    • Published dimensions of bile duct structures may be inaccurate without specifying technique and magnification.
    • Accurate interpretation of bile duct imaging necessitates accounting for magnification.