Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size.

D Regan, K I Beverley

    Vision Research
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

    Journal of histotechnology·2021
    Same author

    Immune regulation of canine tumour and macrophage PD-L1 expression.

    Veterinary and comparative oncology·2016
    Same author

    Oral and anal sex are key to sustaining gonorrhoea at endemic levels in MSM populations: a mathematical model.

    Sexually transmitted infections·2015
    Same author

    Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers.

    British journal of cancer·2011
    Same author

    Some early uses of evoked brain responses in investigations of human visual function.

    Vision research·2008
    Same author

    Ethnically mismatched cord blood transplants in African Americans: the Saint Louis Cord Blood Bank experience.

    Cytotherapy·2007
    Same journal

    Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

    Vision research·2026
    Same journal

    Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

    Vision research·2026
    Same journal

    Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

    Vision research·2026
    Same journal

    Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

    Vision research·2026
    Same journal

    Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

    Vision research·2026
    Same journal

    Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

    Vision research·2026
    See all related articles

    Visual perception of size oscillation is most sensitive with larger targets (2.0 degrees), while frontal plane motion sensitivity is independent of target size. This research explores visual processing of motion and size changes.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual Neuroscience
    • Perception Psychology

    Background:

    • Understanding visual perception of motion and size changes is crucial for diagnosing visual field defects.
    • Previous research has identified stereo-motion scotomata, specific visual field defects related to depth perception.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To measure visual thresholds for 2-Hz oscillations in size and frontal plane motion.
    • To investigate the influence of target size (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 degrees) on these thresholds.
    • To map equal-threshold contours and assess for visual field defects.

    Main Methods:

    • Thresholds for size oscillation and frontal plane motion were measured in 15 subjects using varying square sizes.
    • Visual field testing was conducted to identify any defects.
    • Data was analyzed to determine size dependency and contour shapes.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Size-oscillation thresholds were lowest for larger squares (2.0 degrees), indicating higher sensitivity.
    • Frontal plane motion thresholds showed no general dependence on square size.
    • Equal-threshold contours were generally elliptical, and no subjects exhibited defects for either oscillation type.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual sensitivity to size oscillation varies with target size, unlike frontal plane motion sensitivity.
    • The findings suggest distinct visual processing mechanisms for size and motion perception.
    • The study highlights the preservation of motion-in-depth judgments even with specific visual deficits.