Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Audiometric zero for air conduction using manual audiometry.

R W Fearn, D R Hanson

    British Journal of Audiology
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Computational Fluid Dynamics Studies of a Flow Reactor: Free Energies of Clusters of Sulfuric Acid with NH<sub>3</sub> or Dimethyl Amine.

    The journal of physical chemistry. A·2017
    Same author

    Ambient pressure proton transfer mass spectrometry: detection of amines and ammonia.

    Environmental science & technology·2011
    Same author

    Measurement of the thermodynamics of the hydrated dimer and trimer of sulfuric acid.

    The journal of physical chemistry. A·2006
    Same author

    Mass accommodation of H2SO4 and CH3SO3H on water-sulfuric acid solutions from 6% to 97% RH.

    The journal of physical chemistry. A·2006
    Same author

    Smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movement performance in a prefrontal leukotomy patient.

    Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN·1999
    Same author

    The Reaction of CIONO2 with Submicrometer Sulfuric Acid Aerosol.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1995
    Same journal

    Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Assessing service quality in paediatric audiology and early deaf education.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.

    British journal of audiology·2002
    See all related articles

    This study on hearing thresholds in young adults found manual audiometry results align with automatic methods when tester variation is considered. Adjustments to hearing standards at 0.5 and 6 kHz are supported.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Hearing Science
    • Otoacoustic Emissions

    Background:

    • Accurate hearing threshold measurement is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
    • Variability in audiometric testing methods can impact results.
    • Understanding tester influence is key to standardizing auditory assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To measure hearing thresholds in young adults using manual audiometry.
    • To assess the impact of tester variation on manual audiometry results.
    • To compare manual audiometry findings with automatic audiometry studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Recruited 76 subjects aged 18-24 years.
    • Employed manual audiometers for hearing threshold measurements.
    • Implemented rigorous otological selection criteria for participants.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Manual audiometry data showed consistency with automatic audiometry when tester variation was accounted for.
    • A higher average hearing threshold was observed at 0.5 kHz compared to automatic audiometry.
    • No significant differences were found between manual and automatic audiometry results after including tester variation.

    Conclusions:

    • Tester variation is a significant factor in manual audiometry.
    • The findings support recommendations for adjusting hearing standards at 0.5 kHz and 6 kHz.
    • Standardization of audiometric procedures is essential for reliable hearing assessments.