Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of the Bacteriuria Detection Device.

S M Hoyt, P D Ellner

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    |October 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Smallpox: gone but not forgotten.

    Infection·1998
    Same author

    Exudative pharyngitis possibly due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum.

    Emerging infectious diseases·1997
    Same author

    Role of the microbiology laboratory in care of the immunosuppressed patient.

    Reviews of infectious diseases·1989
    Same author

    Rapid detection and identification of pathogenic mycobacteria by combining radiometric and nucleic acid probe methods.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1988
    Same author

    Sero group C streptococcal infection in intravenous drug abusers: a report of two cases.

    Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·1988
    Same author

    Evaluation of substrates for radiometric detection of bacteria in blood cultures.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1988

    The Bacteriuria Detection Device (BDD) shows potential for rapid bacteriuria detection but requires improvement. Its sensitivity was 89%, but specificity was only 65%, limiting its reliability compared to urine cultures.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Microbiology
    • Diagnostic Technology

    Background:

    • Urinary tract infections are common, with bacteriuria often indicating infection.
    • Accurate and rapid detection of bacteriuria is crucial for timely treatment.
    • Current methods like urine culture can be time-consuming.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Bacteriuria Detection Device (BDD).
    • To compare BDD results with quantitative urine culture for detecting significant bacteriuria.

    Main Methods:

    • A total of 513 clinical urine specimens were tested using both quantitative plating and the BDD.
    • Specimens were considered positive for significant bacteriuria if bacterial counts exceeded 10(4) CFU/ml.
    • BDD performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The BDD could not be tested on 17% of specimens due to clogging or pigmentation.
    • The device demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 65%.
    • False-negative results were observed in 13 specimens, predominantly with gram-positive cocci.

    Conclusions:

    • The BDD offers potential for rapid bacteriuria screening.
    • Further technical improvements are needed to enhance specificity and reduce false negatives.
    • The BDD cannot yet reliably replace standard urine culture for diagnosing bacteriuria.