Related Experiment Videos
Death by poverty, arms, or moral numbness
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|October 1, 1983
Summary
Global weapon prioritization negatively impacts children, especially in the US. Mental health professionals can advocate for vital child social programs.
Area of Science:
- Child psychology
- Public health policy
- Social advocacy
Background:
- The current global political climate prioritizes military spending over child welfare.
- Government policies in the United States have specific detrimental effects on children's well-being.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the negative consequences of prioritizing weapons over children's needs.
- To describe the impact of current US government policies on children.
- To identify advocacy strategies for mental health professionals.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on global child welfare and military spending.
- Analysis of US government policies and their effects on children.
- Framework development for mental health professional advocacy.
Main Results:
- Children face significant risks when societal resources are allocated to weaponry.
- US policies exacerbate these risks, impacting children's mental and physical health.
- Mental health workers possess unique skills for effective advocacy.
Conclusions:
- Shifting societal priorities from weapons to children's needs is crucial.
- Mental health professionals can play a vital role in advocating for essential child social programs.
- Policy changes are necessary to ensure the well-being of all children.