Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Small-for-dates babies at the age of four years: health, handicap and developmental status
Insights
Children born small-for-dates (SFD) showed lower developmental scores by age 4. However, when birthweight was considered, no significant developmental differences persisted between SFD and average-for-dates (AFD) children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Biology
- Public Health
Background:
- Small-for-dates (SFD) infants represent a significant proportion of births, with potential long-term developmental implications.
- Understanding developmental trajectories in SFD children compared to average-for-dates (AFD) children is crucial for early intervention and health policy.
- Previous studies have yielded mixed results regarding the long-term outcomes of SFD children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the developmental outcomes of small-for-dates (SFD) children with average-for-dates (AFD) children up to four years of age.
- To identify factors influencing developmental scores in both SFD and AFD groups.
- To determine if initial birthweight differences account for long-term developmental disparities.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study involving 221 small-for-dates (SFD) and 244 average-for-dates (AFD) children.
- Personal examinations at birth and regular follow-ups until 4 years of age.
- Comprehensive assessment of development across five sectors, alongside analysis of various maternal and perinatal factors.
Main Results:
- At 4 years, SFD children had significantly lower mean scores in five developmental sectors compared to AFD children.
- SFD children had an excess of major congenital abnormalities, but similar rates of handicap without congenital abnormality.
- Factors like social class, method of delivery, sex, gestational age, and smoking influenced development within groups, but these differences diminished when birthweight was accounted for overall.
Conclusions:
- While SFD children exhibit developmental delays by age 4, these differences are largely explained by birthweight when all children are analyzed together.
- Congenital abnormalities are more prevalent in SFD infants, but do not solely account for developmental handicaps.
- Socioeconomic status, delivery method, sex, gestational age, and smoking are significant factors influencing child development, particularly in the AFD group.
Abstract:
221 small-for-dates (SFD) and 244 average-for-dates (AFD) children were personally examined at birth, and seen thereafter at regular intervals up to 4 years, when a thorough assessment was made. There was an excess of SFD children with major congenital abnormalities; but no difference between the groups in the number of children who were handicapped without congenital abnormality. Their general health was good, and the prevalence of specific disease or major ill-health did not differ. SFD girls seemed to have less acute hearing than AFD girls; but there was not difference for boys. The prevalence of squint, impaired vision, speech defects, and abnormalities of gross and fine motor movements were equally low in both groups. At 4 years the mean scores for five sectors of development were significantly lower in the SFD than the AFD group. Within group analyses of 16 variables and their effects on developmental scores showed no associations in either group according to maternal height and weight, birthweights of previous siblings, the presence or not of hypertension and pre-eclampsia, bleeding during pregnancy, asphyxia and injury at birth, or birth order. Within each group the net effect of the remaining eight factors was assessed; adjustment being made for the other seven variables. In the SFD group social class and method of delivery made a significant contribution to total scores. In the AFD group significant differences were found according to social class, sex, gestational age at birth and smoking. Method of infant feeding just failed to achieve significance. When all the children were considered together, and birthweight group included as an additional variable, no significant differences remained between the SFD and AFD groups for any sector of development.
Related Concept Videos
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Intellectual Disability

