Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nonstandard deviations.

M Goitein

    Medical Physics
    |September 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Quantifying uncertainty is crucial for meaningful scientific estimates. This study proposes novel uncertainty intervals beyond standard deviation to address limitations in statistical analysis.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The relative costs of proton and X-ray radiation therapy.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2003
    Same author

    Biophysical modelling of proton radiation effects based on amorphous track models.

    International journal of radiation biology·2001
    Same author

    Modelling the dose-volume response of the spinal cord, based on the idea of damage to contiguous functional subunits.

    International journal of radiation biology·2001
    Same author

    Generalization of a model of tissue response to radiation based on the idea of functional subunits and binomial statistics.

    Physics in medicine and biology·2001
    Same author

    The general relation between tissue response to x-radiation (alpha/beta-values) and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons: prediction by the Katz track-structure model.

    International journal of radiation biology·2000
    Same author

    Radiobiological significance of beamline dependent proton energy distributions in a spread-out Bragg peak.

    Medical physics·2000
    Same journal

    Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Statistics
    • Data Analysis
    • Scientific Measurement

    Background:

    • Meaningful uncertainty estimation requires clear qualification (e.g., standard deviation, confidence level).
    • Omission of these qualifications is common, often due to the inadequacy of standard deviation for normal distributions.
    • This can render uncertainty estimates meaningless and hinder accurate interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the critical importance of qualifying uncertainty estimates.
    • To propose alternative, more informative uncertainty intervals.
    • To address the limitations of conventional single standard deviation in statistical reporting.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing practices in uncertainty estimation.
    • Conceptualization of non-standard uncertainty interval methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of probability density function properties.

    • Main Results:

    • Standard deviation alone is often insufficient for robust uncertainty quantification.
    • Suggested intervals include non-integer multiples of standard deviation (e.g., 1.5 SD).
    • Asymmetric error bounds and consideration of non-normal distributions (long tails, truncated bounds) are proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • Clear qualification of uncertainty estimates is essential for scientific rigor.
    • Alternative uncertainty intervals offer more accurate representation for non-normal data.
    • Adoption of these methods can improve the reliability of scientific findings.