Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[The publishing of ethically questionable research. A commentary].

H Rozemond, M J Dobbelaar

    Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde
    |October 15, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Journal editors face ethical dilemmas when reviewing scientific papers, especially those lacking broad justification. They can reject submissions or publish them to stimulate ethical debate among researchers.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Detection of the K99 antigen of Escherichia coli in calf faeces by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    The veterinary quarterly·2011
    Same author

    [Animal experiments: advice concerning conscientious objections in employment].

    Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·1990
    Same author

    [Animals in biotechnology: chip or resource].

    Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·1990
    Same author

    [To the welfare of man and animals].

    Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·1989
    Same author

    [Dr. H. Rozemond appointed as special professor--'The man/animal relationship'].

    Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·1987
    Same author

    [Experimental dogs: a need for improvement in housing].

    Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·1987

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Scientific Publishing

    Context:

    • Scientific journals are increasingly expected to evaluate ethical considerations beyond scientific merit.
    • This is particularly relevant for studies with controversial methodologies or limited public appeal.

    Purpose:

    • To discuss the ethical responsibilities of scientific journal editors.
    • To explore the criteria editors can use to assess the ethical content of submitted manuscripts.
    • To examine the impact of editorial publishing policies on ethical discourse.

    Summary:

    • Editors must consider ethical standards alongside scientific and stylistic quality when assessing manuscripts.
    • Ethical criticisms may target study purpose, subject selection/treatment, and data presentation.
    • Editorial decisions, such as rejection or publication for discussion, influence ethical awareness.

    Impact:

    • Editorial policies can shape the ethical landscape of scientific research.
    • Engaging with controversial studies through publication can foster broader ethical discussions.
    • This highlights the critical role of editors in upholding research integrity and ethical conduct.

    Related Experiment Videos